New invention of motion less generation of electric power

[Earl]

Luc>
For anyone believing that you can better video quality on YouTube by using lager video size and bitrate then I recommended you please have a look at this topic: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8628.msg221312#new

Earl>
"getting better video quality on YouTube" is not sufficiently precise.  If you mean watching a video in a Web browser, no serious researcher gets info watching YouTube this way.  They download the video with maximum possible resolution and study it via a local high resolution copy.  This is why it is important to upload in the highest possible resolution.  With ADSL or Cable connection and h.264 compression, upload time is not a major factor to consider.

Luc>
The results will surprise you and maybe help save bandwidth for your next video.

Earl>
I am not surprised at all.  I am well aware of h.264 video compression since roughly 6 years.  The profi video compression experts consider h.264 to be a very good compression, perhaps the best at present.  I use h.264 respectively x.264 video compression daily when telecommunicating with programs such as SIP-Communicator and Linphone.

Luc>
I took the time to make this topic to help people save time, so please don't post your personal opinions.
Luc

Earl>
I will no longer post my opinions about your opinions on the thread that you started.  I will, however, continue to post my opinions about your opinions on other threads.

1- videos to help replicators are particularly interesting if the device is a mechanical, non-solid-state apparatus.  With explanation videos, the higher the resolution, the better.  If tens of thousands of people can upload 1080p high res movies to YouTube, why should OU.com members stay with insane resolution of only 320 x 240 ?  You are NOT helping by advising people to use the ridiculous 320 x 240 resolution.

2- In the case of solid-state devices, with no moving parts, it is questionable that videos are better than high-resolution photos.  A 6 to 12 Mpx still photo, appropriately cropped, is a million times better than a crappy QVGA YouTube movie.  The photographer, and the photographer alone, decides how much to resample in size, and how to crop in oder to reach the best compromise between image size and quality.

I do not believe it is in the interest of FE research to show children's movies at 320 x 240 stored on YouTube, when high-quality still photos and hi-res h.264 compressed videos can be easily up- and downloaded at another service, such as mediafire.com

It is in the interest of mankind to require a mandatory download in order to watch a FE video or still photos.  This generates local copies all over the planet.  Supporting the watching of videos on YouTube without a mandatory download is not in the interest of the FE movement.  It only takes a millisecond to remove a video from YouTube.

Regards, Earl

[Nihilanth]

Where's the video?

[aaron5120]

Where's the video?

It's coming! Be patient. Mr. Winsonali has promised us, he will deliver at due time.

[aaron5120]

Hi Winsonali,
The soft iron concentrators for the mechanical generator are ready and have been put in place over the magnets. Please see attached photos. The wooden bases for the magnets and the pick up coils will be ready within a few days.
I am awaiting for the controller IC you kindly sent me several weeks ago, which still has not arrived yet. I wonder if it was being sent be air mail?

[FatBird]

Ali,  The PRIZE MONEY is almost $16,000 now.

Please post one of your OverUnity Devices & collect the money.

PLEASE HELP THE WORLD in its Energy Crisis.

The WORLD needs you.

.