I see an economic diasater coming...

[triffid]

More along the same lines.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFAWG6Kp7Iw&feature=relmfu  triffid

[triffid]

Here are some interesting things Mark Cuban said about the stock market.  Cuban went on to make another point, about how entire nations are now bought and sold within seconds and even nanoseconds:

"It’s hard to believe," he wrote, "but evaluating countries as an investment is now easier than evaluating companies."

Lo and behold, the current malaise on Wall Street is tied not to the earnings of public companies -- which are largely strong -- but to the debt load of national economies.

But Cuban came back again to the traders, who he called "hackers" because, he said, they look for weaknesses in the system to exploit for short-term gain.

"The Government needs to create incentives for this business," he wrote, "and extract compensation from the traders/hackers for the systemic failure level of risk they introduce."

He concluded again in bold text with a scary forecast that, although not completely unique to him, now looks more and more accurate:

"There will be another crash, because there are too many players looking for the trillion dollar score."

[evolvingape]

Hi everyone,

Well I had a chance to think about it this evening and there are basically 3 versions of the electro magnetic HRT.

The first version would be neodymium magnets mounted on the rotor, and static coils mounted on the stator. The beauty of this is that the neo's can trigger a reed switch and close the circuit as they rotate and trigger the EM pulse in the coil. This is not going to be OU, but will allow you to experiment with lever length.

The second version would be similar but using Aviso repelling coils instead of standard coils, whether neo's will work well with this, or not, remains to be seen. Maybe someone would like to ask him what he thinks ? This could quite possibly become OU due to the much higher impulse created by an Aviso coil.

The third version would be based on Electro-Gravitics and to understand this imagine some of Thomas Townsend Browns discs at the edge of the rotor, creating it's own electro gravitic potential. See Chapter 2: Beyond Rocket Propulsion

https://rapidshare.com/files/2514065671/Secrets_of_Antigravity_Propulsion.pdf

This would be the most powerful version and exploit the potential difference between EM and Gravity forces. I think this would be OU without any problems at all but the only thing is none of us know how to build one... yet

If you were thinking of trying one of these versions out then you could possibly build a rotor from carbon fibre arrow shafts:

http://www.merlinarcherycentre.co.uk/acatalog/Easton_Arrow_Shafts.html

You can get aluminum, carbon and also hybrids with an aluminum core and carbon outer sheath. They are cheap and can be ordered cut to size, and are available in lengths up to 1m, giving you a potential disc diameter of 2m

Cast your own joints using fast cast epoxy resin, and some choppies for strength:

http://www.tomps.com/shop/polyurethane-fast-cast-resin-p-129.html?osCsid=jtvop3oan1n8umpufomps3t1n7

http://www.tomps.com/shop/chopped-loose-strands-choppies-p-44.html

And some neodymium magnets:

https://www.hkcm.de/hkcm.php?language=en&osCsid=565bc5ccb8eebbfc634d517414c7d960

The magnets can be pre-positioned before you cast the joins holding the shafts together and become integral to the structure

Then you just have to rig up some coils and reed switches on the stator to trigger the EM pulses as the rotor spins.

If you were to mount the rotor to a hub then you can cast an adaptor plate to join the rotor to the hub, and the hub will connect directly to a shaft via a taper bush:

http://www.technobotsonline.com/shafts-and-adaptors/taper-bushes-and-hubs/bf-bolt-on-hubs.html

http://www.technobotsonline.com/shafts-and-adaptors/taper-bushes-and-hubs.html

Then you just need a PMA, something like this designed to produce power at low speeds for wind turbines:

http://www.windbluepower.com/Permanent_Magnet_Alternator_Wind_Blue_High_Wind_p/dc-520.htm

Then you can decide to either connect your PMA direct drive or use a pulley and a belt.

That cheap and simple enough for you Chet ?

RM

[triffid]

Hi RM you  said  The really exciting thing about it though... by using the HRT design and securing the coils to the turbine you have not only converted a linear coil reaction to rotary moment, but also have turned what was a constant... the linear repulsion force... into a variable... by changing the length of the lever it is mounted on .I'm not sure what you mean here but I have searched for years on how to turn a linear electric force into a rotary one.The closest I ever got was a device from the ozarks that converted rotary mechanical forces into four linear forces.It was used to grind grain in ancient times.Oxen were bound to the device(large scale version that is) and went round and round.The blocks of stone would go back and forth grinding the grain.The device was called a "hillbilly do nothing" and fit in the palm of my hand.If I could find a way to turn linear electric forces into a rotary action I might be on altering time flow for an object.I would be slowing down the time flow for an object in the field.In theory that is.One of my pet projects.triffid

[evolvingape]

Hi triffid,

You are absolutely correct, in an attempt to keep it as simple as possible I opted for the magnet on the rotor and the coil on the stator. But this is the opposite of what I meant in what you quoted. I have not been getting enough sleep lately and sometimes my brain fogs up and I make errors.

Imagine that the Aviso coil, which is a linear repulsion force, is encased in a cylinder and then fired repeatably. The piston will be repulsed and then must be returned via some mechanism for a repeat firing. This is the same as a standard ICE piston that moves back and forth linearly, in a single linear axial plane. This linear motion must then be turned into a rotary moment, if for example it was going to run a car. This function of turning linear movement into rotary moment is normally achieved via the crankshaft and eccentric cams, but it is not very efficient.

By moving the coil off the axial line (the pivot centre) and placing it on a lever end, and rotating the coil through 90 degrees you are able to fire the coil and this will produce a rotary moment about the pivot.

The torque moment produced at the pivot is greater the further that the coil is from the pivot (larger potential difference). So the same force that would act in a linear plane, would be increased by placing it at the end of a lever, and converted into rotary moment via rotation of the coil through 90 degrees. It will now react in a circle in the direction of the circumference of the shaft, and not linearly down through the centre line of the shaft.

So in summary, in order to gain the benefit from increased lever length creating a variable and proportionally larger torque moment at the pivot, and the conversion of a linear force into a rotary moment force, the coil must remain on the rotor.

Any questions just ask dude

RM