I see an economic diasater coming...

[sparks]

   I will say one thing for the British is they know how to rule.   They realized a long time ago that you do not enslave your colonies.   The founding fathers in their wisdom knew a time would come where the populace would be unable to elect a leader capable of running a country for the benefit of all it's citizens.  This is enevitable when money buys elections by controlling the media.  The person who actually elects the candidates is the one designated to go to the electoral college to vote for the various candidates.  It is assumed that the electoral college will elect the candidates who "won" the vote of the state designated electorate.  This is an assumption and the electorate can elect any candidate on the roster.  If you want to make a very powerful move find out who your state selected to go to the electoral college and educate them as to the real power they have.  They are not patsies of there parties political system they are a filter to filter out such people as Obama and Romney who are criminals.  I believe that their election of a person known to be incapable of leading a nation is a criminal act as they took an oath to elect candidates who are most capable of governing the country for the welfare of all it's citizens.  I would have it be known that if they elect obama or romney they are in violation of the US constitution and will suffer the consequence of breaking the law.

[camelherder49]

Interesting reading!!  I see a pattern.

[triffid]

Camelherder49,your article is fantastic!All of it needs to be put here!So we will know whats going on!triffid



Abraham Lincoln ^2 From this we see that the solution worked so well
Lincoln was seriously considering adopting this emergency measure as a
permanent policy. This would have been great for everyone except the
money changers who quickly realised how dangerous this policy would be
for them. They wasted no time in expressing their view in the London
Times. Oddly enough, while the article seems to have been designed to
discourage this creative financial policy, in its put down we're clearly
able to see the policies goodness. "If this mischievous financial
policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated
down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money
without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have
all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become
prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains,
and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must
be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." *






This is why usury is such a great EVIL!

[triffid]

John Kenneth Galbrath The American economy has been based on government
debt since 1864 and it is locked into this system. Talk of paying off
the debt without first reforming the banking system is just talk and a
complete impossibility. That same year Lincoln had a pleasant surprise.
Turns out the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II, was well aware of the money
changers scam. The Tsar was refusing to allow them to set up a central
bank in Russia. If Lincoln could limit the power of the money changers
and win the war, the bankers would not be able to split America and hand
it back to Britain and France as planned. The Tsar knew that this
handing back would come at a cost which would eventually need to be paid
back by attacking Russia, it being clearly in the money changers sights.
The Tsar declared that if France or Britain gave help to the South,
Russia would consider this an act of war. Britain and France would
instead wait in vain to have the wealth of the colonies returned to
them, and while they waited Lincoln won the civil war. With an election
coming up the next year, Lincoln himself would wait for renewed public
support before reversing the National Bank Act he had been pressured
into approving during the war. Lincoln's opposition to the central banks
financial control and a proposed return to the gold standard is well
documented. He would certainly have killed off the national banks
monopoly had he not been killed himself only 41 days after being
re-elected. The money changers were pressing for a gold standard because
gold was scarce and easier to have a monopoly over. Much of this was
already waiting in their hands and each gold merchant was well aware
that what they really had could be easily made to seem like much much
more. Silver would only widen the field and lower the share so they
pressed for... *

[triffid]

So this is the first time I ever heard of a good reason against having a gold and silver standard.triffid


The money changers were pressing for a gold standard becausegold was scarce and easier to have a monopoly over. Much of this wasalready waiting in their hands and each gold merchant was well awarethat what they really had could be easily made to seem like much muchmore. Silver would only widen the field and lower the share so theypressed for... *