Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

Started by WattBuilder, September 14, 2009, 03:19:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cloxxki

Very nice video Howard!
I really like the force meter, that's a great thing.

You seem to be measuring the intertial "hit" on the exit side, and the peak resistance of the sticky spot, which is logical at first glance. I then get to wonder...can both really be compared that way, in the same unit of measure? I mean, let's say exageratingly you have a 10 inch long sticky spot halfway the lever, averaging .2lb. When you slowly push it through, without benificial  gate behind it, you would be shedding quite a bit of inertia on your way through it.
Simple example : lever speed 20 inches per second hitting the sticky spot. Taking consistent "drag", providing you JUST make it all the way through, you'd average 10 inches per second through the sticky spot, making it take exactly one second. Negative thrust is 0.2Lbs. Here's where my physics knowledge is rusty. How many Joules would the sticky spot then rob?
The inertial force hitting (being absorbed while measuring) at the exit, tell us how heavy a weight could be momentarily be lifted supported without heiight gain, right? I wonder whether a tap of the same impulse could get you through the sticky spot on the way in.

If you could try and estimate the length and average of the sticky spot, you might be a step closer to proving gain beyond anyone's doubt.

Good luck with your progress,

J

WattBuilder


Thanks Cloxxki,

Yeah, I thought the force meter would be a brain tickler    ;)

Actually the lever weighs less than 0.1 lbs. and there is friction force loss from the air drag and bearings. After saying that I will like to point out that the force measurement of the output should really be a lot higher If I was measuring closer to the output end of the array instead. In the video you will see that I measured extremely far away on purpose and still got a terrific gain of energy of 300% at that point.

Now for the sticky spot, the force gauge started at zero to 0.3 lbs. for a certain amount of length. The noticeable reading are shown only when I enter the magnetic field. The length of the input force is nowhere near the length of the output. You can actually see me at the beginning of the video releasing the lever with my hand causing the lever to slowly drift downwards. Then you will see me lift the lever higher closer to the array and the array pulls it into the end to hold.

Remember the Yu Effect is when you apply kinetic energy to a magnet through a magnetic array, you will get a gain of kinetic energy out the other end from the magnet.

Basically it eliminates the sticky spot problem …..  no more worries !

The kinetic energy applied to the magnet is from the Yu Oscillating Generator’s bottom counterweight. Yes it’s that simple !

This Video is conclusive proof I have achieved OU.   



Regards,
Howard Yu

Video: The Yu Effect â€" proof of energy gain from magnets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBtl0OTSccs
 


happyfunball

A minor point, but I wondered if when you first released the swing arm on the left (left in the video), if what was shown was magnetic attraction, or a function of the counterweight, or both? Thanks

hartiberlin

Hi Howard,
Hmm,
energy is force x distance.
When you only need 0.3 Newton for 5 cm you need
0.3 Newton x 5 cm = 1.5 Newtoncm of energy to push the rotor-magnet-arm into the array.

But when you hit the forcemeter it is only maybe a few Millimeters,
so you get maybe 1.3 Newton x 0.5 cm= 0.65 Newtoncm
of energy out.

So I found your last video with the remote control much
more convincing.

Too bad you did not work with pickup coils around your magnets
and store this energy to turn the magnets on the rotor arm.
This would then be the final proof that it would selfrun.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

mr_bojangles

i find it extremely odd that it is now top heavy,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq5r08eqgsk&feature=related
this one appears not to be this way


i don't believe this to be proof of OU,

firstly because your set up is top heavy

your lever starts at the base of the track, and does lift it up the the 90* mark and past it, but everything after that is gravity

does the difference in weight happen to be about 1.3 pounds?

if so it might be the momentum of the difference in weight

to prove OU you could simply balance your lever, this would show your track is overcoming the friction


i agree with stefen, if this is the video he was refering to, bc this one appears to have gain whereas i can't see the top heavy version being able to reset itself
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it." 
-WC Fields