Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

[synchro1]

I seized on a great solution! The remote controlled automatic car door lock! Anyone who owns a late model car is familiar with this feature, and the sound the linear solenoid makes when it opens and shuts the door lock bolt. This solenoid not only comes complete with a DPDT switch, but it has a capacitor in the circuit. Buying one off ebay, or the auto salvage market would give one a remote
switch station along with the powerfull pole reversing solenoid. This should be many times more efficient then the current brush motor he is using. Look, Mile High, I'm unwilling to spoon feed you. Find a tank circuit diagram on your own time.

[markdansie]

@MILEHIGH Please stop your negativity over here and only read this thread and only post if you have ideas how to enhance the gain effect.

Hi ,I thick your a bit rough on Milehigh, he has articulated what many have expressed here.
You speak about the gain.What gain? We are trying to establish is the gain caused by the weightshift or is it indeed the magnetic array? From what I have seen there is no net gain with the magnetic array as it is is being pushed through the sticking point by the gravity of the counter weight. We have kindly asked that the magnetic array be removed to do a comparison or the magnet attached to the servo be affixed so it rotates on a neutral axis (no weight shift)
It is important to break these two down so we know what forces are at work here.
All further discussion without these tests or enhancements to the designare fruitless until these fundamentals have been established.
HJ never demonstrated anything that could be harvested because in the end everything balances out.
I am, along with many others are trying to be constructive here, but it is futile to proceed with design improvements if the device is based on a false premise.
The single isolation video proved nothing as we do not know the difference in mass between the rock and the magnetic device.
There is nothing sophisticated about what we are asking.
Your were kind enough to give us some leway with the Mylow device and we saw many other reputations demolished, but ultimately it was the OU forum and the skills of its members that ultimately exposed that fraud. In this case we are all impressed with the originality of the approach, but concerned about the ignorance to address issues raised.
I do not want to dampen anyones enthusiasm, but it is important to put in place reality checks before moving ahead based on assumptions only.
Kind Regards
Mark

[WattBuilder]

@Cloxxki,

There’s no need for critics before testing is finish. They are taking up time and efforts for progress to move forward. There are replicators on this but they are not speaking up and I don’t blame them for not wanting to deal with the heat yet. 


@exnihiloest,

There’s has been progress since you last posted this……….

I'm sure you will get many other memberships and ignorant bigots to support this new "science". It will be just a bit more noise in the FE domain.
Good luck.

I suggest you see the videos first. Then on the one cycle video ask yourself is their a gain from the magnetic array. This will be your foundation for argument with out getting past that point your arguments will have no relevance.

One cycle   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k
Gain video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq5r08eqgsk


@Bulbz and synchro1,

I agree, I do have one of those auto door locks solenoids. But the plunge is less than an inch. Haven’t figured it out yet. I’m still fighting with the turbine. I really need to see where the power is at. I just need to beat 1.3W for 2 seconds. If not, it will show us where to focus.


@markdansie,

It’s his place you know. He has every right to protect his forum. This forum can’t be a place for “public stoning”. How do you aspect other inventors to speak up.

As for Milehigh I believe his responses were contradicting himself and were unproductive.

I'm not the other inventors or scammers …..  I don’t know? I’m not them. I have done nothing to be treated like them.


Howard

[hartiberlin]

Hi Mark,
the One cycle  movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k


clearly shows, that there is a gain in, so please no more negative comments anymore.

Surely it would be nice, if Howard would remove the upper magnet array
and show us, that the remote control back and forth movement will
NOT make the pendulum accelerate so fast as with the magnet array on the top.

[markdansie]

Hi Mark,
the One cycle  movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k


clearly shows, that there is a gain in, so please no more negative comments anymore.

Surely it would be nice, if Howard would remove the upper magnet array
and show us, that the remote control back and forth movement will
NOT make the pendulum accelerate so fast as with the magnet array on the top.

1. It clearly shows nothing as the mass would have to be the same let alone the position of the mass. This is so basic I am not sure why you cannot see that. (great party trick and so much more imaginative than fishing line)
2. His refusal to remove the array as a comparison test speaks for itself. No amount or verbage and semantics will change anyone's mind on this.
3. Since when asking basic questions is a negative? My sister is a cop and taught me to keep asking the same question until you get an answer or two different answers to the same question.(even better)
4. At this stage we have an inverted swing with the magnet mounted on the servo being of centre pumping in the energy with each isolation. (why can"t you see this?). As suggested if he centered the magnet so there was no offset of the servo the device would not work.(prove me wrong)
5. This is the first stages of perpetuating a scam. Wave a big stick and tell the non believers that they must remain silence or else. (Look what the My low project did to Sterling) I have to play by the rules so I will make this my last post. Many people have contacted me privately on this project and will not post here as they always get threatened with a big stick if they ask questions. Lets keep things rational and on a scientific basis here.
6. I have followed through on many devices listed here over the years. Some my involvement privately is still active. However history is not on my side. Your prize is still in tact. This does not stop us all hoping for a breakthrough, but as time goes on many of us grow wiser and more experienced in evaluating these technologies. Why are you so down on some of the best people and most experienced in your own forum? Why are we the bad people? Go look at the history of the all the threads and show me one device that has demonstrated overunity. I can show you many where people have wasted other peoples time and money and in some cases solicited funds in a fraudulent way. I an no Erik Grieg, but if it wasn't for the rational majority asking questions this forum would join the ranks of the Sterling Allen's, Denis Lee's and others.
7. This takes me back to the days of the Mylow tapes on youtube pleading his sincerity and gathering the mindless masses to discredit and attack the non believers. Many of us who dare question the technology were attacked. You allowed us to continue you question here. What has changed? Sterling attacked this forum pubically, destroyed the NEC(several resignations) and now has his hat out begging for money as all credability was destroyed. Just silencing us is turning this into another circus, one with an obvious ending.
No need to ban me as this is my last post on this topic. However can I suggest you start another thread called "I told you so"
Kind Regards
Mark