Steven Marks secret

[Yucca]

SM Said:

It is obvious that most of the people reading the web site and
experimenting know nothing about reading a scope and understanding
what perfect frequency is.

When discussing signal analysis, perfect frequency is perfect sinus. Any waveshape other than sinus contains other frequency sinus components (mixed with the fundamental) and so can not be considered pure (or perfect) frequency.

That is my understanding of the words SM used, although it may not have been what SM was trying to say, perhaps he meant to say that the pulse period and width needed to be absolutely solid with no jitter, to achieve perfect timing.



Being an audio electronics researcher SM probably used these 3 tools for analysis:

[1]
pure white noise injection containing ALL frequencies at equal amplitude within the bandwidth of interest (probably 0...100kHz) Then monitor output for spectral flatness using speccy analyser.

[2]
impulse response of sub systems, stanadard electronic analysis tool, hit a system with an impulse with a rise time as fast as possible. Then watch how intermediate and output stages react using a scope. We all know you hit a real world circuit with an impulse and it will ring, thus revealing resonance points. Interestingly the theoretically "perfect" impulse contains all frequencies DC to light.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impulse_response

[3]
Checking linearity and phase of stages using a reference oscillator (pure sin) and then observing input/output with a scope in X/Y mode.

edit:
One more thought I have had is that perhaps in his Spherics technology he may have tried employing dual coil speakers and mixing the correction signals with the original signals within the speaker itself (magnetic mixing), by mixing at the last possible stage he would minimise the noise floor. Perhaps in this configuration he noticed energetic "sprogs" (unwanted spectral peaks) that exceeded his sum input power?

[giantkiller]

The IRF840 has an internal Zener diode.
Look it up and it showed up here:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://jnaudin.free.fr/spgen/images/irf840.gif&imgrefurl=http://jnaudin.free.fr/spgen/index.htm&h=566&w=654&sz=28&tbnid=eWwNpMKYbPXbpM:&tbnh=119&tbnw=138&prev=/images%3Fq%3DIRF840&usg=__b0F1URwuW_k-fpdjyN7UZViq6xQ=&ei=juLVStqHGojwMaaTrJQD&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=4&ct=image&ved=0CBgQ9QEwAw

Yes I can add another diode facing the opposite way than the internal one.
Your description of rewiring sounds very much like the ECD. Or Tesla's bifilar pancake coil. Pulse goes in from the outside to the inside then back out only to input again. This time into a previously established field.
The BEMF from the feedback burns the pulse drivers.

@GK

In your diagram, what would happen if you put a diode between the D and S of the IRF840 (love them buggers), pointing towards the source for return flyback.

Also, I don't think the control coils (CC) should be in series with the collector ring(s) (CR).

Maybe do one test.

On the S of the IRF840, connect any coil of high inductance (CHI) (could be a toriod transformers secondary wind). You have two rings so connect them in parallel but one side of one ring to the other side of the other ring and same for the two other wires. You will have then two wires for the rings. On the other end of the CHI connect one end of the rings and send the other end of the rings to ground. Connect your CC in parallel and connect to a bulb. Now pulse the CHI/CR and see what the bulb does.

[Grumpy]

see the zener diode in the image at bottom of this page:

http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/transistor/tran_7.html

[forest]

Maybe the solution is to eliminate mosfet althogether for creating effect and use it only periodically to recreate the effect again after "slowdown of effect" !
From my limited knowledge I would say that internal diode is put into mosfet to eliminate any usage of creating vibration !

Tesla noted that frequency is immaterial and the effect can be produced slow or fast.
My idea : put much faster diode across mosfet then internal one then switch mosfet just slowly (< 1khz) . MOSFET cannot be a source of this effect !

The effect occur when you do "something" at the peak of impulse. For mosfet it's the falling slope of signal and mosfet really cannot do anything at that moment.

[giantkiller]

@Yucca,
In regards to your audio post.
After I saw the sparks demo by SM, imagine my surprise when he mentioned 5khz and my measure of the same frequency in a stun gun? What if that is another way of saying 'Look at this other example!'. I have seen the parallels of his speech before.

At that point I thought to myself 'What if he is adding more than there really is?' You know, to obfuscate to keep the technology under some guise of control for what ever reason.
I have hung onto that logic this whole time and it has never failed me in my pursuits. Mainly because I would not be led in too many directions or inferences.

And now that the addition of feedback is status quo the XL controls the tuning of the coil. The dynamic inductance shows up in the ramp up and the bouncing of the harmonics kept in check by the coil specs. It is all mobiused so beautifully. The incoming fluctionations on the gate cause a stream of frequencies in the coil's field. The tuned ones rock the coil and the untuned die out as current. Just like a tank circuit.

So we pump high speed shocks into the coil. As the force/energy settles down it diffuses into the copper of the coils and then we see things as electronics portrays them. Then different frequencies respond to the dynamics of the coils. Some tuned in, some tuned out. The static windings control it all. The supporting circuitry enhances both sets of energy, tuned and untuned. Since the windings are static the rest of the circuitry can remain simple.

The high rise times cause the magnetic field build far away from the copper. This distance is an area we are looking at. Because as that field is there we are impinging upon it again with other harmonics. Very much like the field play in Tesla's bifilar pancake. A field within a field or cannonballs.

Once again I stress this one point. This whole adventure is based on one man's demos. Anybody with electronics knowledge drools over what they see. I saw sparks, he and witnesses stressed vibrations. These are irrefutable, conclusive facts. My contention with other explanations is 'Nobody is pursuing these 2 facts together'. We got talk and maybe some vibrations but where are the sparks? And why are they there? The color is the same as a stun gun's sparks.

This all boils down to 'The copper is getting hit faster than it can conduct.' The faster you hit the coil the more effect you get.

This is the same as the micro spark gap in the stun gun internals. We charge up a gap, get a high speed discharge into another tank. Then we short the tank to get output. The steel in the end of the gun or the last stage holds the field longer so we can hit it again. But the TPU has copper in its last stage...

--giantkiller.