Pauls Device; a damn shame he regrets revealing it.

[DarkLight]

And here the scheme with the problem

[lancaIV]

1.The SMOT experiment shows 34% lost,important for the construction
? of a closed-SMOT- cylcle ! 1-0,34=0,66 means 66% max.conversion potential !

2.SMOT V2 as next step is more Daniel Baker-ramp related !

3.The mainly interest-I think-is not this little-sweety demonstration object
? with an extraordinary result of 0,424mJ (3600000J=1KWH) action gain but
? the exposed Magnet-Motors designs from Greg Watson and JL Naudin !

Closed-ball-Cycle concepts:Thrumball or Batelle-Institute

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ?de Lanca

[Omnibus]

Paul uses the same principle as in SMOT, but he uses a magnet instead of steel ball. The advantige of this is that we have no unwanted magnetising like in the case with steel ball. The field here is more stable and predictable. But here remains the SMOT problem  output -  intput that appears when we close the loop. I have made schemes of the magnetic field to illustrate that.  The rotor magnet moves because of the asimetry of the magnetic field. Until we have asimetry whit constat value and direction, we have a force with constant value and direction witch moves the rotor magnet and we can drain excess energy from the device. But when we try to close the loop, there where the end of spiral of stator magnets has to be connected to it's beginig the field is hard  deformed. The asymetry changes it's value and direction and the rotor magnet stops.

That?s correct. That?s why Paul uses the most intuitive approach ? applying energy from without to overcome the sticky spot. It appears that this problem is solved in a more attractive way in Wesley Snyder?s device (of course, we?re still waiting for the video of its independent run). It is interesting to see how he achieves that constant asymmetry leading to a net force tangential to the rotor just by the specifics in construction. It would be nice if this could be modeled in a way similar to the schematics you gave.

[Omnibus]

the exposed Magnet-Motors designs from Greg Watson and JL Naudin !

Closed-ball-Cycle concepts:Thrumball or Batelle-Institute

de Lanca, has Naudin achieved experimentally a closed-loop experiment (Closed-ball-Cycle concepts) or these are just ideas? If so, could you please post a link?

[lancaIV]

Their work is exposed in the jnaudin-webpage,
from SMOT to SMOT V2/SMOT MK3 to RMOD/RMOG,
but remark the last update:1999 !

It is time to ask them about :progress ?

"Thrumball(?)/Batelle-Institute"? each of them developped
Closed-Cycle-systems,but not based by magnetism/steel balls or fluids,
they used balls as Energy-Transmitter !
Excuse me,but I can not more remembering the right parameters to refind the
information,my last relation with that info:+/- 10 years before !

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca?