Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!

[h2ocommuter]

I appreciate the detail on A size and would really like to see any results where A size is specific to the geometry of the next stage. I am sure that the match can be made very specific. A matched gap to a very High 'Q' resonance ringing should really produce very expressive output.

So here is one that I am sure Grumpy had covered but can't remember. When the discharge crosses the gap the generated magnetic field should be spherical albeit very noisy or have an erratic edge and travel with the discharge from terminal to terminal. Not that it means anything here but should be like a cannon ball when it hits the other terminal.

I am not at the stage where I can say anything about the Q factor or test for it though I do have some videos that show some remarkable findings.
I have a silent spark that discharges from a 630 v .7 uF cap that taps "sound", the IT and lights the light bulb, "low wattage.
and if I discharge the cap another way I get a large bang and Nada on the IT or light?

That seems to contradict the quote of yours so I was wondering about your thoughts with my discharges, and circuit?
http://www.youtube.com/user/h2ocommuter

The second video clearly shows how this tapping is heard.
http://www.youtube.com/user/h2ocommuter#p/u/2/2qC03Bqp7GA

h2ocommuter

[giantkiller]

@H2,
I reference the stungun ckt for this since that is a good model.
The internal microgap is there to ping the primary of the output transformer.
If you let a large spark transmit then you have lost power in the primary stage. The smaller spark is just the 'Clanger hitting the bell(coil)'. By having a large spark in the primary stage you are essentially hitting the bell(coil) with a sledge hammer and that deadens the output. The whole idea is to spank the primary causing high impedance when sends a greater shock wave to the later stages.
Are your CLF bulbs gutted or is the internal circuitry still in there? Put a regular filament bulb in those sockets. The CFL gas bulbs are easily excitable from shock. The filament offers slow resistance. They will blow if shocked too hard. Also the the CFL are electrostatic while the filament are conduction based.

Let me know where the contradiction my statements apply.

Also, increase the gap, like an inch, of the side you don't want to use while testing the other side.

[h2ocommuter]

Thanks GK,

I realized the question was unfair on my part.
My CFL are not gutted and my normal bulbs will not blink.

my contradiction statement was trying to understand the silent spark verses the loud spark idea you stated.

It seems the quiet spark has more umph than the loud one?
I was trying to get a direct kickback about why that was the case.
I will do some more studying. The silent spark seemed to physically shake that 60# IT, and I wondered why it did that with the silent spark versos the loud one.

I have along way to go.

God Speed
h2ocommuter

[Rosphere]

Your goal is to find the timing depending on what materials or forces you use. Using resonance overcomes the losses. Work with nature and you rule the universe. As a child did you ever cause tidal forces in the tub with your little hands? You don't have to stop no matter what age you are.

Thanks for the reminder.   

[giantkiller]

In alternating current engineering the magnetic wave is the one that is consumptive and retarded, whereas the dielectric wave is productive and advanced. You could say the electromagnetism is the fundamental geometry of consumptive retardation. Dollard circa 1988.

--giantkiller. Pi/2 > c.