Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!

[Grumpy]

@Grumpy,
Yep, I used 90degrees and Spherics used 45degrees.

@

You can see the hexagonal configuration all over Jon's Coral Castle Code site.  Rather uncanny to see it is so fundamental.  60 degrees.

Trying like hell, but can't find an easier way to make the shock that does not require precise timing.

[giantkiller]

Also the 2 parabolics. Andrew Basiago mentions these as a temporal field transmission antenna.

You can see the hexagonal configuration all over Jon's Coral Castle Code site.  Rather uncanny to see it is so fundamental.  60 degrees.

Trying like hell, but can't find an easier way to make the shock that does not require precise timing.

[giantkiller]

This is as clear as it gets:
http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/device03-1.htm
This picture is the one I had been using for interrogation. The red stripe is the Bloch wall separation coil. It is pulsed in the opposite way as the main 2 copper coils.
At first when I saw the PVC I knew the prospect of low amperage, high resonance.
There is even a fan as a spark gap on the left hand corner of the board. I believe this circuit is a close model of the Telsa ionizer. This can be done with 555s.
And this device here is a Hubbard subset but matches Bill Muller's backyard turbine to a Tee. And Don does have a Hubbard built that runs also.
http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/device09-2.htm
Between the boards is a spinning wheel, most likely aluminum with holes in it that cut between the electromagnetic coils. The motor is in the center view.
And in device 6-1:

The Magnetic Flux Energy is Amplified then Transformed into Electrical Flux becoming useful Power.

This is the correction to all previous coil attempts where the electrical approach has been tried. Don Smith reiterates this numerous times in the vid. That is why the flux is cut instead of snapping the coils with drive. The difference in the approach is with the wrong way we push a field out then let it collapse. The correct way is cut the flux of a resonant field and let it snap back to normality. Looks a polarity issue.
@Grumpy, The perp fields do this interface / interaction also. This is the kind of control that the Stargate type devices need. Erfinder and Spherics know what they are talking about.

And this one thread has the complete mix of it all. Check out the model of Coral castle. Then the moon fountain.
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/2410-stan-deyo.html

The current website is here but nothing has changed:

http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/

I don't know if Don is still alive. I haven't found any posts by him since 2005. I think the site is hosted and maintained by a relative of his.

[innovation_station]

THE LAST  pic you posted gk IS THE EXACT SAME DEAL AS MAC'S BREAKING COIL ... BUT THE MASS OF COPPER IS TUNED TO THE NEO .....

TO CUT THE FLUX ....  THE COIL IS THEN SHORTED ... AND RELEASED TO ATAIN USEABLE  ELECTRICAL POWER FROM 0 INPUT!

MAC HAS DONE THE SAME THING WITH OUT MOVEING PARTS ASIDE THE SW ... BE IT A REED OR WHATEVER .....

BUT IT REALLY DOES NOT MATTER ... 

THEASE THINGS CAN WORK A NUMBER OF WAYS .. 

I REALLY LIKE THE DEMO HE DID ....  KEEPING IT SIMPLE ... 

I LIKE THAT 

IST!

TAKE A T COIL SMACK A STEEL SHEET INSOLATED FROM AN IDENTICAL STEEL PLATE TO YOUR LOAD THEN TO EARTH GROUND ....



HOW MANY KW YOU WANT ?

PS GK ... DID YOU DRAW THAT ON FIG 113 ....   LOL !

[Xaero_Vincent]

innovation_station,

Where can I find more info on Mac's coils? Any replications?