Scalar Wave - Energy

[sparks]

    @Loner

   I was taught by people with closed minds that plasma only exists in the hot exhaust of a jet engine and lightning bolts.  This was in the 60's.  Now I find out it is in flurescent bulbs.  Spark gaps.  Interplanetary space.  A room temperature metal.  Now I find that a magnetically self pinching plasma defies laws of thermal dynamics.  The more energy introduced into the field occupied by the plasma the cooler the plasma appears.  Eventually I feel man will be able to create plasma at point a  bundle it and send it to pointb.  With electromagnetic stimulation that disrupts the selfgenerated currents of a plasma the plasma will transmute into hot gasses to be used in such machines as steam turbines. 
   Sorry about bringing up the problem Einstein spent his lifetime working on.  Finnally he comes to the conclusion that mass distorts time and space which is expanding.  Mass of course are dimples on the expanding Universe where things appear to be accelerated by gravity towards the center of mass while in his reality they are just stuck to a portion of the Universe that is not expanding at the same rate as the vacuum.
   As you can see I have focusing problems.  My mind is all over the place all of the time.  I need a little meditation time to slow this chemical computer down or I am going to cook the processor.

[xee2]

@ Loner

Note:  I have, personally, seen a transmission of power/data from the inside of a Faraday cage to a device outside the same. 

A Faraday cage only shields against electric fields and RF fields. It does not shield against magnetic fields. You can take a compass into a Faraday cage and it will still point north. The device probably was using a magnetic field to send the data.

Shielding against magnetic fields is hard to do and is usually done with steel or high permeability material. Such shielding is not technically part of a Faraday cage. Faraday cages are usually made of copper screen or copper sheets since good conductivity is important in order to obtain good shielding.

Most researchers place small magnets around the Faraday cage to counteract the Earth's field if they are concerned about both electric and magnetic fields.

If you do a little research you should be able to verify this for yourself.

[fritz]

Dear All,

First, I want to point out that it´s essential in such discussion to separate pure and elementary physics from engineering "thumb-rules" which are simplified for special engineering means.
Take the typical rf communication systems for example:
The goal is to spread information as wide and homogenous as possible. How do you achieve that ?
Well you have limited maximum transmitting power which is matched with the antenna to drive the free-air vacuum freefield impedance. So you try to excite the empty space or ether or whatever with a matched source.
In this scenario you couple the entire energy in the other media - and somewhere out in the far-field - another antenna (which is matched again to the media) couples the available energy at that point from the media in a matched way back to the receiver.
In such a setup both sides are matched to the "media" - in this case the empty space or however.
Because both sides are matched - there is no standing wave nor direct connectio in that media.
So if you turn on 1000 remote receivers+antenna - the power taken from the transmitter will always be the same. Even if there is no receiver.(well thats simplified but true in the far-field)
Well, if you want to transfer energy - this is the complete wrong technology.
If you want to transfer energy - you want the transmitter react to the receiver - both should be "in touch" - and if you don´t take energy out - you don´t want it to be transmitted.
So what happens if we skip that rf thumb-rules and approach the following scenario:
If we setup a transmitter + antenna system which is not matched to the empty space - but matche (impedance wise) to the energy receiver?
If there is no receiving antenna - the transmitting antenna will reflect the energy back to the transmitter (which is highly unwanted in normal setups).
Only if a loaded receiver is present - a standing wave between both antennas will establish - which guides the energy on the direct path. Because both antennas are matched to each others - but not to the media - you will have a standing wave between both antennas. This effects that impedance wise - both systems are "connected".
Similar situations are very typical in acoustic setups.
It´s still EM but has a wider context than radio or television broadcasting.

Buried Radiator Antennas:
Well, its all about matching.
In lower rf - frequencies the dominant transmission is tied to the ground - so you can tap the wave with a high antenna at empty space impedance - or in the ground with almost zero impedance. If you can match that impedance to your receiver- it makes no difference. A buried radiator sounds quite promising compared to a 20m cable between to apple trees;-)))


rgds.

[infringer]

Scalar waves are an interesting theory its one of the first things I found interesting when browsing the net wound up here.

I wonder about a lot would it be possible or likely for quantum entanglement to play a role in this if the theory is correct or the other way around.

[BEP]

@Loner,

For your enjoyment.... http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/larson/1957_April.pdf

Yes, buried antenna were commonplace. What isn't common is the concept of an antenna image.

Oh, that little circuit-board... For us it was in an olive-drab aluminum box with an AN-T??? number. We just called it the 'birdie'. The receiver was called a 'bird-watcher'. And yes, the birdie could be heard 'chirping' from inside a passive or active 'cage', whether they leaked or not.

They weren't using the birdie to test for leaks. It was used to test for inside signals modulating the birdie signal. They didn't want the TEM portion of the birdie signal getting out. After all, back then everyone had a birdie