Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits

[broli]

It gives a 15ns current pulse in the inductor windings (not the parallel capacitance, so it's real current)

So the frequency is at 66MHz? That's quite high for a joule thief, I recommend you replicate it and measure frequency to compare the simulation frequency.

[PaulLowrance]

So the frequency is at 66MHz? That's quite high for a joule thief, I recommend you replicate it and measure frequency to compare the simulation frequency.

It's a pulse, so it is composed of a lot of frequencies far above 66MHz.

Paul

[Groundloop]

PaulLowrance ,

A super cap of 650 Farad charged to 2,7 Volt has 2369,25 Joule of energy.
Converted to Watt/Hour = 0,658125 Watt/Hour. A 2900mAH 1,2 Volt NiMH battery
can put out maximum 3,48 Watt/Hour.

Now, the circuit ran for 14 hours using 13mA/h at 1,495 Volt. So each hour the
input usage was 0,019435 Watt/Hour. The total used in the 14 hours was
0,27209 Watt/Hour. That was ONE run. Now how many times can he run
from the same battery before it is empty? Approx. 12 times.

Now 12 runs later he has generated 7,8975 Watt/Hour of power. So by using
3,48 Watt/Hour he has generated 7,9 Watt/Hour. This is a COP= 2,27.

Alex.

[poynt99]

I'd like to give gadget the benefit of doubt and allow him to prove his claim of OU.  Conventional science is still learning a lot about magnetic materials. Furthermore, some scientists, by profession, that I'm working with are beginning to believe there is something unknown about intense electric fields.

Paul

Gadget claims he has already shown proof of OU. My challenge to you then is to point me to this proof, or demonstrate proof of your own. This is about gadget's version of the JT, anything else is irrelevant at the moment.

.99

[PaulLowrance]

Gadget claims he has already shown proof of OU. My challenge to you then is to point me to this proof, or demonstrate proof of your own. This is about gadget's version of the JT, anything else is irrelevant at the moment.

I can only prove my own claim, which is entirely different than gadgets claim. Have gadget prove his own.

Paul