Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits

[innovation_station]

i c everyone has been busy ... 

kooler 5 stages your nutz !  : )

tysb3

you seam keen ! 

i useing flb's for stage 2 as i get 1500vdc spikes per pulse from a 3/4 dead aaa : )

i have scoped it !  and this is on every single wire in the transformer im useing 2 bulb ballasts  so i have  4 pairs of  wires ..  fireing 1500 vdc from 1 pulse

from a depleated aa

so i made the mini power stack   just 2 main stages and a few aux stages .. 

sir it is ou ...  : )   BIG TIME

william

[innovation_station]

my stage 2 unit is really a stage 3 unit in my entire device ..  but it has many things in 1 unit

this is what it does

salt water cell  power source
freq convertor   like a joule thief
pulse motor / hf switcher machanical ...
kicker module 
OUTPUT

i built it in a stack i use a 12vdc battery for power source for the kicker bords it is recharged from the pulse motor and the salt water cell and solar ..  the pulse motor is powered from a boost cap wich is recharged from the freqcon! : )

i have built most of this already and am almost done ..  it is A LOT OF WORK !   

W


here is a video of the ist way stage 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_vIF_K3QSo

[tysb3]

@ all Hi,
Thanks to wattsup and Magluvin for good ideas, -  SIDAC + ignition coil.
Now I  put on this JT, -  SIDAC + ignition coil + JT.
Now I dont need double JT because of SIDAC
I dont try it yet, because I dont have SIDAC and ignition coil,
but I will do it. 

[tysb3]

you will not becomes enough voltage and power in Capacity, that the sidac can fire
this to ignition coil.

The pancake coil help nothing here.

Pese

Hi
thanks for comment.
this is yet only on idea stage. I check sidac for parameters. You could be right. they heave big leakage current at stand-offvoltage and perhaps to big breackdown voltage.
for start I find this ones: TRISIL LS5018B/LS5060B
Im not physicist. pancacke JT coil is for additional reiciving energy from addtional pancacke coil. on this I could be wrong.

[Wolfgang29]

IST:

That statement means absolutely nothing and yes I and everyone reading this should demand that Gadget show some proof that he has over unity.  He doesn't have it and it is extremely unlikely that he is capable of proving it.  That's the case for you also.

Broli:

There are the right ways to learn and there are the wrong ways to learn.  Spending a hundred dollars and hundreds of hours building and testing something that doesn't even work is not the right way to learn.

MileHigh

Mile,
While I am new here, and I have not posted much, in the last two years through the help of this forum I have gone from knowing almost nothing of electronics to being able to understand and build such basic things as captrets, inverters, pwm's, solar chargers etc.
Your statement, "Spending a hundred dollars and hundreds of hours building and testing something that doesn't even work is not the right way to learn."  is a rather illogical one at best, and a pessimistically misguided one at worst. Your statement only functions on the assumption (or decision you have made) that this device does not function to its specs in the slightest. To which I must say that the burden of proof concerning this statement is solely upon your shoulders. Prove thoroughly that it is not. Additionally, the only way one can know with surety that something does work, and know which exact and specific parts to only ever use for that something, is if one already knows the outcome. And, I must say dear sir, experimentation is not exactly about what we know (or think we know, since your claim is unverified), experimentation is as much about taking a leap into the dark, and what we don't know. If we constantly walked into a lab TRULY knowing the answers, we would end all experimentation. its called experimentation, Not verification.
I would also hesitate to determine that there is a wrong or right way to learn something, and if my way should be imposed on you, or vice versa.
   Furthermore, your statement, " He doesn't have it and it is extremely unlikely that he is capable of proving it.  That's the case for you also." is not only an Ad Hominem argument,  but it is a statement which functions solely upon assumptions. People's interactions in life are largely influenced by how much they bring in from their past. Assumptions are at their core, guesses based on the past. At the end of the day, human beings dwell in slavery and oppression because one man is too afraid to give up his power over another, for fear of reprisals seen in the past. If only each side could fathom that the other wants peace and respite just as badly. This was the assumption of the cold war. This is the fallacy of assumptions: that all that has existed is all that can exist. We do not have to dwell in a world of pre-determined options, but rather a world of uncreated possibilities. If you drive forwards and look backwards, you will surely get a ding. My advice, without any judgement upon you, is to unclench your fist and your mind, and have a little faith in your fellow man. Be well.