Joule Thief 101

[EMJunkie]

Now you are getting it. In the DC case, the magnetic field is set up while the current is changing during the "switch on" time of the current. Once the current is flowing at a steady rate, it "costs" nothing more to maintain the magnetic field, and the field itself doesn't dissipate power. This is how superconducting magnets work. The situation is perfectly symmetrical. You get no current produced from a stationary magnet sitting next to a coil, because there is nothing changing. Move the magnet (or the coil), so that the coil experiences a changing magnetic field, and you get current.  Remember Faraday's Law of Induction (and pay no attention to the confused ravings of EMJunkie): The induced EMF is proportional to the _time rate of change_ of the linked magnetic field. You can take this algebraic equation and re-arrange it according to ordinary algebra, and see that the two situations are indeed symmetrical. The "conundrum" comes from mis-stating the problem or situation in the first place.

TK - Because I used to have some respect for you, I will let you know here, another Member of this forum, and other members, that do not ever post because of people like you, (as a Team), have replicated my work successfully!

These people have done exactly all the right things, ticked all the boxes in a thorough research experiment that verifies exactly what I have been showing the world for some 5 years now.

That's one more experiment that you couldn't do properly, that someone else has!!! I have been in contact with these people over the last few days and they just spent most of the night up in their excitement, not able to sleep!

Very soon, you will be the last person on the planet after MH Dies of dementia, forgetting to feed himself to death, that has not achieved the simplest task ever set forth...

Three Coils, or four Coils, the right Connections, the right turns and one can very easily achieve what you fail to grasp - An Excess in Charge Separation, or to some: Over-Unity!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: I will have to say, using foresight, the hardest part for you will be having to admit you were wrong after everyone else has succeded!!! Ouch thats going to sting like nothing else isnt it! How to shatter a God Complex 101...

[minnie]

I was going to get myself an osillyscope, but virtually no one on here knows
how to use one- perhaps this is a more suitable toy.
Junkie,you sure live up to your name....Junk.

[tinman]

 author=minnie link=topic=8341.msg479640#msg479640 date=1459963875]

Oh dear tinman, you really do need to study basic induction,

We'll see how your basic induction skills go in the not to distant future.
As you are the one claiming that i need to study basic induction,then i expect you to be the first to answer what is happening in my up and coming experiment.
I will expect you to explain as to how voltage(that normally leads current) can be shifted to be in phase with current. You will explain as to how the two can become in phase with each other in a transformer,then we will see how your induction skills are.



Brad

[tinman]

Brad,

One last thing, what would be required to make Water flow Up hill?



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Water already flow's up hill-daily.


Brad

[minnie]

tinman,
       would you agree with Koala's point about a super-conductor?
                   John.