Joule Thief 101

[TinselKoala]

But it is OK for you to Miss-Represent EVERYONE Else's work - Are you Special are you TK???

Old mate, you are just funny!

Look, I was winding you up a little bit, for reasons I won't go into here.

Yes, you have helped many with the understanding of some things, but at the same time, you have also held many back with your Biased advice that have no real fact or value in Science.

You cannot refute anything I've said, by reference to any legitimate source, experiment or even demonstrations of your own. You continue to lie about me and my work and my statements.

Common, lets put the pieces together!

The Magnetic Field's, when the Rotor in on Approach to Stator and the Stator Coils are carrying a Current, Do What: ____ _____ ____ _____, _____ ___!

Why dont you, use your expertese to actually get the ball rolling? Is it that Belief's are getting in the way?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

You are, as usual, incoherently babbling.

[tinman]

Throwing a bunch of links against a wall is useless.

Only useless to you,because it proves you wrong-once again.

I have never seen anyone here get it wrong as many times as you have in one thread MH.

Brad

[tinman]

Good, so that patent shows a resonant cavity in the combustion chamber can be used to improve the performance of a two-stroke engine.  And you also put up a link showing how resonance in the cylinder of a typical four-stroke automobile engine reduces performance.  So there is no simple one-size-fits all answer and things have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  So that one is a draw.

No,that is another win for me.
There is two opposite examples of existent resonance in the combustion chamber that you said never existed

Another fail by you MH.

Brad

[tinman]

Well, take a neomag.  It takes a lot of energy to magnetize it right?  Then, over a period of time (I have heard 100-200 years) it loses its magnetic strength...so... if it is not dissipating that original energy...where is it?  Where did it go?  Or, what did that energy transform/convert into?

Bill

Thank you Bill.

But i do think this go's beyond MH comprehension,and lack of understanding.
There are also many other ways to show a PM dissipating energy--we will see how MH go's with it>

Brad

[TinselKoala]

WRONG!!!


180 Degrees is the angle you will see!!! Faradays Law does not predict this, its actually Heinrich Lenz and Lenz's Law!!! Written as a (-) sign in the Equations of Faradays Law of Induction.

Which is Equal and Opposite.

See TK, if you had a handle on this, you could see and do so much more!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

You are truly idiotic! Did you fail calculus in school, perhaps? Or maybe never even took it? You can see for yourself that Brad's scope traces _perfectly_ describe what is predicted by Faraday's Law of Induction !

Or maybe you can't. Do you not understand what "time rate of change" actually means? d/dt? Apparently you do not. At the peaks of the waveform the time rate of change goes to ZERO-- the instantaneous slope is horizontal. Faraday's Law tells us that the induced EMF at that point is ZERO. At the zero-crossing of the waveform, the time rate of change is MAXIMUM -- the instantaneous slope is as steep as it ever gets. Faraday's law tells us that the induced emf (with negative sign) is MAXIMUM at that point--- as is clearly shown on Brad's scopetraces !

Do you even know what the magnitude of the phase shift introduced by your cheap current clamp actually is? Have you ever done the simple test I asked you to do long ago, comparing the current clamp reading with a simultaneous reading from an in line CVR?