Joule Thief 101

[tinman]

Well I have made thousands of postings filled with good solid information and in the earlier days I helped people understand their circuits all the time.

Indeed you have.
And whether you choose to believe it or not,i am truly grateful for this.

My biggest peeve MH,is you jumping on everything i say,and then try to prove me wrong on it--along with all the un-needed name calling and vulgarity. I will give back what i think i am given unfairly,but i will not go as far as you have. Feel free to call me names,but remember there are youngsters reading these forums.


Brad

[MileHigh]

Neither did you--your own questions.

You insist that everyone here use correct and accurate terms used for description's,telling me i need to brush up on my English,and yet you deem it ok to use loose terms when it suits you--such ass stiffness--which is incorrect.
You also clearly state that all the energy is then stored as kinetic energy during 1 part of each cycle.
This is also incorrect,and you too would be booted out of one of your EE forums you speak so much about for saying rubbish like that.
If !all! the energy was stored as kinetic energy in one part of the cycle,and then all that energy was returned during another part of the cycle--where is the energy to create sound coming from?

You wanted so much to be right and accurate,and you wanted to make us wait some 7 odd weeks for the big reveal,and it turned out to be a flop-->wrong-->and you know it.

Of course,once again we do not see any other EE guy here point out your mistake's,there more happy taking on others(hobby bench men),about things like phase shift not being real--another of your rubbish statements MH.

If you want me to post the reply where i stated elasticity,then you go find what number post was your first post of your two questions,as im not going to spend hours looking for something you missed.

Brad

The questions were answered correctly.  It's not my fault that you can't understand or are ignorant of how a simple academic question is typically posed and expected to be answered.  Or you do understand and you are just making a fool of yourself.  Either option is not good for you, but I wouldn't be surprised if it is the first one.

Cite your own postings.  We both know I read your postings and you came up short and couldn't answer the questions.  And it looks like you embellished the stuff about elasticity and massaged it into something more correct and along the lines of what I wrote.  I seriously doubt that you sounded that coherent in your original posting.  I am not 100% sure but that's what it feels like to me.  I dare you to prove me wrong in both cases.

[Johan_1955]

Johan, your peers should be embarrassed and frankly horrified by your behaviour and you should be flagged for that.

Mine SORRY, really, when I did in some way that did hurt you, again SORRY!

But when you talk so about Karma, we all would / did think you understand that part!?

Try, to stand between you're both polarities, and look queer, not for me, for you, ALL, only real loving menthe.

[MileHigh]

Some external source is providing energy

Brad

If you could only understand the concept of an impedance change in the system then you would not be marveling at the "energy from magnets."

[MileHigh]

My biggest peeve MH,is you jumping on everything i say,and then try to prove me wrong on it--along with all the un-needed name calling and vulgarity. I will give back what i think i am given unfairly,but i will not go as far as you have. Feel free to call me names,but remember there are youngsters reading these forums.

Brad

You know that I read your postings where you tried to answer the questions.  So why did you accuse me of not reading them?