Joule Thief 101

[tinman]

 author=MileHigh link=topic=8341.msg481008#msg481008 date=146085421

MileHigh

Brad has been going almost nuts and his behaviour is as bad or worse than mine

Well thas easy to prove MH. All you have to do is find posts where i posted profanities such as you have used--and had to apologies for
Can you back up your accusations ?.

98% of the time when he claims that I am wrong, he is wrong.  98% of the time when I claim that he is wrong, I am right.

Again-can you back up your claims?

You were absolutely disgusting and you never had the character to apologize for it.  It's a black stain on your character.

Seem to remember a member on this thread acting in the same way not so long ago,to the point where other members of this forum that dont even post on this thread,had to tell you to calm down a bit,as children read these forums.

You tag-teamed with him for a full year and both of you were over the top.  It was truly awful.  If you want to gloat over your awful behaviour, go ahead.

Well thats the pot calling the kettle black.

Motorcycle dude crossed a line.

Who is motorcycle dude

[tinman]

1-The drop in current flow through the primary coil(the drop in P/in),means the impedance value of the primary coil went up or down?
>>> Irrational question.  There is no mention of the voltage.  Get help to learn how to compose a coherent sentence from Posters Anonymous.











Brad...
I've got something to say...
I really loved the skillful way...
You posed those questions like peddles, touché!

NOW, Brad, dammit, answer the question in posting #2073 about "magnetic field's."

Oh,i see lol.
Regardless of the fact that you know the questions are based on my transformer under test--you pull the old !!not enough information !card out . Well that shows a bit of a fail MH,as the 1st question clearly states(in brackets) that the P/in went up-the extra value to make a correct determination of the answer required.

2-The increase in current flow through the secondary coil,resulting in a higher power value dissipated across the 5 ohm resistor, means the impedance in the secondary coil went up or down?
>>>  Irrational question.  The impedance of the secondary coil is not discussed in this context.  There was no Brad secret decoder ring used in the answering of this question.

The secondary coil has current flowing through it,and power being dissipated across a 5 ohm resistor. The secondary coil is wound over the primary coil,and so the question is valid.

3- The combined results of the transformer as a whole,means the impedance went up or down?.
>>> Irrational question.  No answer provided, see recommendation in answer #1.

Enough information for those in the know,to provide an accurate answer.

4-The phase relationship between the primary and secondary coils current is bought into phase with each other how?
>>> Use a resistive load.

See question 2-quote: across the 5 ohm resistor

5-Show another transformer test carried out that shows the EMF and current phase relationship between the primary and secondary coil of a transformer to be in phase.
>>> Irrational question or use a resistive load and rose peddles.

See question 2-quote: across the 5 ohm resistor

6--provide a link or information on a transformer where the secondaries current leads that of the primaries current.
>>> Irrational question or see Brad's "magnet on a Popsicle stick that wobbles transformer" experiment extraordinaire.

The extraordinaire will get back to you on this one.

I will add in the spoon feeding information to the questions for you MH.
BRB.


Brad

[Pirate88179]

Even if you don't follow the news, this one was really really hard to miss.  That's a deficiency.  The other deficiency is not denouncing what motorcycle dude did.

You were the aggressor and I shut you up and shut you down.  Then you had a moment of soul searching about your character and about over unity itself.  You realized that it was consuming you and you had nothing to show for it for years of work.  For all practical intents and purposes you disappeared.

And here you are defending Brad when I am arguing things with Brad like, "No, you do not measure the top speed of a car on a hill."  And you are a car guy for Christ's sake!

Turn off the bad boy Magluvin and just go back to being civil again.  But I will never forget that one full year of insane vicious harassment from you and the fact that you never apologized for it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecunQO_uoIg&list=PLq5_IODrGmKgXMn2NrFl8UTpSkrqq0NWh&index=45

1:05 in the video.  Bruce Springsteen's Racing In The Streets. 1978.  When reading your post those words jumped out at me...and it bothered me for a while...then I remembered and did a little research.  I KNEW I had heard that before.  Of course, I was still in college then which might explain my having a hard time remembering, ha ha.

Bill

[tinman]

Here you go MH
I have added the requested information in regards to the below questions.
Please read carefully this time,and note that the load !is! resistive.


Brad

[Magluvin]

Just a minor wine glass update:  I am assuming that after the big reveal that there will be a lot of challenges, whining, moaning, complaining, resistance, disbelief and showboating.  The simple truth is that I did all of the "analysis" in my head - just in my head.  I didn't have do any Google searches or do any research at all - I just used my background and my wits.  Of course if I said that and just left it at that there would be no end to it, and it would devolve into more reams and reams of trash talk and drive Magluvin nuts.  So I did my Googling and after 20 minutes I have a bullet-proof backup for my upcoming reveal, and it is exactly like I knew it would be.  That will put a stop to the insanity and shut it down.

Ok. here is the post above. It is an update. Reading it, it is an update that MH had just did a simple analysis in his head, without any google, etc Then did 20 min of google to check himself.

So when exactly did you do it all in your head? 35 yrs ago? Or just then, and put up an update on it? Or was the 'update' intended on letting the readers know that you knew it all along?  Looks more like it was a very recent thing. Not as you claim in your recent post.  And why is it an update. Update from what and when? And update to tell some 'history'?  A history that has no previous article or story to be updated???   Cant you understand that there are people that can remember things and take things in context? 

It was 81 pages back

Anyway.... Back to the bench

Mags