Joule Thief 101

[MileHigh]

Mags:

It's over now, time to move on.  But the dark stain of your gratuitous gleeful continuous attacking and degrading of me for a full year rests within you.  Yer attempts to brush it off just make you look even worse.  What a horrible, horrible thing you did, it was truly disgusting.

Where are my answers about the wine glass?
Where are my answers about the wine glass?
Where are my answers about the wine glass?
Where are my answers about the wine glass?

That's just a foolish fake characterization.

Yeah. Didnt mean to 'hurt your feelings' err nuthin.  Yer so sensitive. Even seeing your own words reposted gets you down.

It's a deep dark ugly stain on your character.  Do you think anyone on this forum would like to be continuously attacked without merit by some psycho out-of-control thug for a full year?  Don't apologize, be half a man, be a fake.

MileHigh

[Magluvin]

Mags:

It's over now, time to move on.  But the dark stain of your gratuitous gleeful continuous attacking and degrading of me for a full year rests within you.  Yer attempts to brush it off just make you look even worse.  What a horrible, horrible thing you did, it was truly disgusting.

That's just a foolish fake characterization.

It's a deep dark ugly stain on your character.  Do you think anyone on this forum would like to be continuously attacked without merit by some psycho out-of-control thug for a full year?  Don't apologize, be half a man, be a fake.

MileHigh

Yeah. Its done. Time to move on Master of the dark stain.


Fake Characterization?      How many times have you asked or made a statement about someone answering your win glass question 'just' in the last 2 weeks? Do you know that number? Its not fake. Your audience knows. They are not just meat with eyes.


Just keep hugging on to your dark stain.    What, is that the new talking points term from the weekly book of how to troll, For Dummies?    You are familiar with the term Dummies, as we have 'witnessed' here recently. So I figured it wouldnt bother you much.

Mags

[tinman]

Mags.

Yes it was a scrap.  Brad walked into it because of his comment about my English skills.  Yes I fully understand him, but the underlying point is that when he does a technical description then it's a real problem and many times it is not understandable.  So a little sting to get him to motivate himself is his just dessert and it has merit.  He does need to improve himself yet you don't see him stating that, all you see is bad attitude and defiance for a common sense request that was asked politely several times before.

I don't want a thumbs up or a thumbs down, it's time for Brad to pursue his experiment on the thread that is dedicated to that project.  I already stated that I have no intention of going there.

Brad kicked up a lot of sand and some went back into his face.  He has been insulting me continuously for two months, did you see?  That's what you get when you go haywire.

I don't take any gratuitous pleasure in this whatsoever but you did.  You are the worst, lousiest most disgusting human being I have ever seen on this forum and we both know exactly why that is.  You out-trolled everybody.

MileHigh

More lies i see MH
You just cant help your self. Your english is no better than mine.
Good thing i dont write in short hand-hey.

Brad

[tinman]

Webby:

You are simply not getting it and you are hung up on "drives another system" and forgetting that resonance is energy transferring back and forth in the resonant system itself.  You do not need inputs in the way you are stating it, you just need some sort of energy process to put some initial energy into the resonant system.

The skyscrapers are resonating and oscillating.  Can you answer the two questions?

Brad:

Try learning "to" and "too" and "new" and "knew" and "theirs" and "there's" and "dose" and "does."

Nonsense.

More English comprehension issues that you need to work on.  The two sentences can mean exactly the same thing and in this context they do mean exactly the same thing.

If you guys want to be willfully ignorant, that is your choice.

MileHigh

And Bingo
In this context ,the two can mean the exact same thing.
There for my answer about how you determine the resonant frequency of the wine glass was correct,when i stated that-you measure it,along with the methods i provided.

Every one here was always going to be wrong in your eyes MH,but just another dose of your self delusion.

Brad

[tinman]

Since MH does not know the difference between resonance and oscillation,, he can not answer the questions correctly.

Any one who at least reads the links provided will have a better understanding of that difference than MH is willing to acknowledge.

ETA:

Don't forget that there are no solid state switching devices that are normally closed,, that would make no sense at all

Yes,it should have been-What determines the natural oscillating frequency of a wine glass,as resonance is a continual oscillation at maximum amplitude at the oscillators natural frequency. And to maintain maximum amplitude,there must be an energy input--the other half of the resonant system.

Brad