Joule Thief 101

[ramset]

Miles
You really should stay in your Pond , and Not taunt everyone in the Boat ...

What Brad is Speaking of actually does have Merit .
---------

But for Clarity .

what's the Question again ?


and where's the Boat ?

@Miles Quote to Brad

"You can sit in the same boat as the others"
end Quote
-----
?

[tinman]

The only thing you are exposing is your true self.

Yep--some one who dose not take people lying about me lightly--thats you MH.
I agreed to leave it all behind,but you continued to use my name along with your lies.
Now you have my full attention

Now,how are you going with your travis effect research,and how it relates to what myself and Mag's are referring to?-is this going to be another ICE situation ?,or are you actually going to correct your mistake straight up?.

2nd--how is your answer coming along in regards to your coil question.

It is important for you to answer the question you asked EMJ and Wattsup,as then we can see if you had the right to pass judgement on them,and see if you !can! actually answer your own questions


Brad

[tinman]

Miles
You really should stay in your Pond , and Not taunt everyone in the Boat ...

What Brad is Speaking of actually does have Merit .
---------

But for Clarity .

what's the Question again ?


and where's the Boat ?

@Miles Quote to Brad

"You can sit in the same boat as the others"
end Quote
-----
?

what's the Question again ?

MHs coil/voltage question

You have an ideal voltage source and an ideal coil of 5 Henrys.  At time t=0 seconds the coil connects to the ideal voltage source.  For three seconds the voltage is 4 volts.  Then for the next two seconds the voltage is zero volts.  Then for two seconds the voltage is negative three volts, and then for the next six seconds the voltage is 0.5 volts.  Then after that the voltage is zero volts.

The question is what happens starting at t = 0

MH has claimed that EMJ and Wattsup failed to answer this simple 001 electronics question.
You have seen yourself Chet,that over many threads MH keeps bringing this up--as some sort of distorted victory over EMJ and Wattsup.
It is now time MH shows that !he! can actually answer his own question.

He has !so far! been unable to do that.


MHs boat was the Titanic--it sunk some time ago.


Brad

[MileHigh]

No Brad, I have explained how to answer that question probably between 20 and 40 times over the years on this forum and I have nothing to prove to you.  Surprisingly, you missed it.  Although, considering you corrected your own spelling mistake and scolded _me_ about it, I suppose that nothing is surprising.

Here is a laughable quote from you on April 19th where you are addressing me and you shamelessly lie:

<<< Your english is no better than mine. >>>

Really, why should anybody believe anything you say after reading that?  You are clearly in "nightmare from hell" mode and you will say almost anything.  It's a sad grotesque thing to see.

Here is big news for you:  When one cap discharges into another cap you lose half the energy and the same thing happens with two air tanks.  Magluvin said that he "fails to believe" that you lose half the energy in the case of the capacitors so perhaps both of you would want to investigate capacitors and air tanks in more detail to understand what is going on.  If you are going to proclaim over unity then the burden of proof is on you.

[MileHigh]

Not true completely MH,

You CAN waste 1\2 the stored energy,, but you do NOT HAVE TO.

If you bother to read and understand my little post covering this and except the fact that I can do this mechanically,, very easily actually,, basic stuff,, then you will see your error.

Just because something is done one way does not mean that that is the only way of doing it

Webby, don't you give me this stupid-ass "your error" nonsense.  You can THINK I am sure, and you are fully aware that I was not referencing anything you said.  Pull yourself together and have some self-respect.  That nonsense posting is a clear case of you trolling me.