Joule Thief 101

[Magluvin]

Hey Smoky
Started winding this thing and it hit me.  You said you spent time winding as neat as possible, something like that. Too many pages to go through.
So I thought, each winding needs to be perfect in respect to neighboring wires so the capacitance is the same so all the loops are tuned to 1 freq?

Having a sloppy winding will cause different resonances within the winding and not have max effect at 1 freq.  So I presented 2 depictions of how I could wind it according to your advice. Which would you like me to do?  I only did 3 turns as an example.

Thanks

Mags

[Magluvin]

Like should I force side by side alignment of the turns or let it follow the core being smaller diameter in the middle and larger outside diameter.

Mags

[seychelles]

NOW YOU MUST SEE A TRANSFORMER..

[tinman]

Brad:






MileHigh

You have got to be absolutely out of your mind.  All this time you have been ragging me about the "secret" and it's bloody gravity.  Yet again, you are making a fool of yourself.

I am not kidding MH.
Please show us in your post(any of them) where the top speed was to be determined on a flat road.
Please show us where you posted !at what altitude! your speed test was to be done.
Another fail on your behalf MH,as you failed to include all the environmental conditions related to your determination test. Might as well leave out resistance when calculating P/in and P/out.

Make a posting that says, "We need a new test for a car's top speed.  We need a level track, an uphill track, and a downhill track and we need to quote three top speeds for every new car."

Nope--just need all the relevant information in order for you determination to be correct,and then you would have covered all three above.
What you going to tell an uphill racer,when he asks what the top speed of your car is up a 30* incline?--I dont know,we only know flat road speed

Why don't you go join these two automotive forums:

http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/
http://ls1tech.com/forums/

Why dont you go and join,and explain to them (using your formula) how to determine the top speed of there car's,and see how you go with that.
How do you think top speeds of vehicles are determined at the end of the day MH--the accurate determination? .Just like the resonant frequency of the wine glass--they bloody measure it. There are no MH wonder solutions used to make the final determination of a vehicles top speed.

Watch the posters there slice you to pieces and make mincemeat out of you and think that it is an early April Fool's joke.  You are unbelievable, or should I say beyond unbelievable.

So go ahead MH,go try your luck with your skill set,and see how you go.
Go give them your formula for top speed,and we'll see who is laughed out of the arena.

More retarded nonsense.  A sewing machine is not designed to resonate.  If you hit some kind of resonant mode in a sewing machine something might start shaking too much and ruin the machine's ability to sew.  In other words, a sewing machine will not operate "better through resonance."  Any mechanical machine or system will have all sorts of resonant modes and by  design they are normally to be avoided or they are intentionally damped out.

Oh--nice back peddle there MH. You have gone from !no resonance! in a sewing machine (in your crazy attempt to eliminate resonant systems in an ICE) to nearly every device having resonant node's lol.

Smoky2 even made reference to it.  I am pretty sure that he was talking about the mechanical resonant frequency of an entire engine block assembly.  The last thing you want to have is an engine revving at the fundamental resonant frequency of the engine block assembly because the thing might shake itself into destruction.

And so was born the counter balance shaft.

I will call you out on this - you are completely full of shit.  You are showing your critical flaw

My only flaw so far in this thread,would be wasting my time continually putting a stop to your own bullshit MH--and i have done that

"Everything" I said?  All that you are doing is showing that when you are stressed from a debate is that you will lie through your teeth as it suits you.

Did you just call me a liar MH?
Show me these lie's MH.
You are a coward-there is no two ways about that.

Therefore, when you get into this state, nobody should be surprised if you pick and choose when to lie to advance your cause.  You simply can't be trusted when you get into a heated debate, and for all practical intents and purposes you completely lose your decorum and become a temporary pathological liar.

There is no debate MH,as you have not put forward anything that relates to !what resonance is,or !how is the resonant frequency of a wine glass determined. Instead you play your silly little !4 to 8! weeks game--truly pathetic.
I am not going to call you a liar MH,as i think it is more a case of you just not knowing what the hell it is you are talking about.

That has already been decided.

Lol--not yet--4 to 8 weeks

Just read what I stated above and think about it a long hard time.

I am happy with what i know,and how i have learned what i know-->and that is why i can correct your mistakes all the time.
Just read that Mag's had to teach you some simple stuff on LED's as well --at least you are still learning MH.

There is no point in this kind of debate since you seem to lack common sense and you simply cannot be trusted like I sate above.

The debate issue again.
OK MH-how many times have i put forth answers to your question's?
And how many times have you put forward or presented a counter argument toward this !!!debate!!! you so much want?.--->Idiot.

The only thing I am interested in is closing the loop on is the two questions about the resonating wine glass.

Grammar error ?-dose not seem to make sense. Is there a spare !is! in that sentence MH ?.
Your not interested in that at all,or you would have presented !your! answers in this !!DEBATE!!! long ago. What is very clear(to everyone here),is you are more interested in seeing how much of a disturbance you can make in this thread. Your continual !!failed!! efforts in dismissing resonant systems that increase efficiency's ,has be exposed.
You are only here to disrupt--and that is very clear.

I am not a liar MH-->you are a fraud.


Brad

[tinman]

Brad wanted to scrap like a football hooligan and just this one time I decided to stand my ground.  That's what determined the direction of the thread.  The truth behind people's true character comes out in times like that.

So, time to move on and do your thing.

What i wanted to do MH,was expose you for who you really are--and that is a bullshit ex-spurt---ex being a !has been!,and a spurt being a !drip under pressure! .
In nearly every thread on this forum,if it dose not fit your !determination! of correctness,you just start your same old crap.
This was/is a good thread,and with good intention's. But here you are,once again, trying your best to dis inform people. Once again,you are trying to call! rubbish!--without having anything to contribute--4 to 8 weeks .

When you start saying crap like-there is no resonance at all-in any way,shape,or form,in an ICE that increases the efficiency of an ICE--then i am going to stop you in your tracks--stop your bullshit-->and thats what i did.
But you got your knickers in a twist,and for no other reason than it was me that corrected you--and you did not like that.

So yea--your right. When i seen you start with your incorrect babble,in an effort to turn people away from these experiment's,you got the big rugby tackle from me,and i put you on your ass.

So why dont you put your ass on a plane,and come and tell me face to face that i am a liar,in stead of hiding behind your keyboard--ya gutless little weasel.


Brad