Joule Thief 101

[ramset]

Mags
I brought you a Thing...if you haven't seen this thing ,,,your gonna Luv it

thanks to Franco for posting it .

http://www.lafucina.it/2014/09/01/esperimento-acqua-e-suono/

takes the salt shaker sound pattern vid to the next level..I wonder if cavitated water [zillion fine bubbles] in an aquarium
or rain drops in an aquarium ?? would show the salt shaker waves you posted  in 3 D ...or maybe  smoke in an aquarium ??

what a wild place we live in !!

[MileHigh]

Your continual insistance of everyone being wrong, while you have provided nothing in the way of answers, is now considered as nothing but unfounded babble.

As you offer no counter argument, that is backed up with proof, you are seen to be no better than those that also try to peddle free energy devices for self gain.

You are a phoney MH--thats all you are, and not worthy of anymore of my time.
You provide endless talk, but you never back up your own claims.

Brad.

This is just a bunch of sour grapes from a sore loser.  I am not insisting on anything, I was just telling you that your responses were wrong.  You have said a ton of stuff in this thread that was babble, and you were told straight up that it was babble.  That's much better than being in a continuous "affirmation environment" no matter what you say or do.  That just coddles you and makes you comfortably numb.

More whining and complaining about no counter-argument.  When you don't know something you are used to being told the answer within 15 minutes of not getting it.  There is no instant answer, there is no multiple choice, there is no trophy for every single child on every single team in the soccer league.  Instead you have to study and work it out yourself.

Calling me a "phony" is just another cop-out to make you feel better.  Brad isn't wrong, he's just dealing with a phony - my ass.  The endless talk has come from you.  Instead of having a debate like a rational person, all that you could do was insist that you were right on just about every point, or call me a liar, even if it meant you had to say the same thing 20 times over.  You are so used to being coddled, that hearing the straight goods from someone was enough to make you freak out.

Time to move on,as most of us have a grasp on what resonance is,and how it can reduces losses/increase efficiency's in all manor of different systems.

You clearly don't have a grasp on what resonance is in a wine glass.  Resonance is not some kind of "magic increasing efficiency effect" like you are trying to allude to.  These things have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  And I don't give a rat's ass about the speed of the vehicle and I would not be surprised if your "missing ingredient" actually turns out to be phony baloney like I already told you.  There is no point in bringing up the same thing over and over.

If you want to take another shot at answering the wine glass questions, go ahead.  If they remain unanswered, they will be answered later.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Although simple,it is incomplete,and a determination of the car's top speed cannot be made from the information provided as MH has clearly stated.
You can see he has only included frictional forces,while leaving out one other force that is vital in determining the top speed of the vehicle. This missing force provides the needed information about the environment in which the car will be traveling in,and without it,the determination cannot be made.

I will give you an example of Brad's potential phony baloney, retarded logic, whatever you want to call it.

The "one other force that is vital in determining the top speed of the vehicle" is gravity.  If the car is on a downhill slope, it will have a higher top speed compared to if the car is on a flat surface.  If the car is on an uphill slope, it will have a lower top speed compared to if the car is on a flat surface.

Wow, such profound insights - NOT.  That would be a laughable "MileHigh is WRONG!" argument from Brad.

Whether it really is the "missing gravity factor" or not, I don't really know.  I am just using the example of gravity to illustrate the possibility that Brad is full of phony baloney and bizarre thought processes about this issue and not thinking straight.

[MileHigh]

Perhaps MH would like to go and argue with all these other guy's that say the very same thing i have said,in regards to !what is resonance! ,instead of doing nothing other than providing nothing.

Here is another example of an illogical thought process from Brad.  I am not arguing with anybody about what resonance is at all.  That's just another Brad stream-of-consciousness ricochet going off somewhere in his head.  I asked two simple questions about resonance for the case of a wine glass and I specifically requested short, simple answers of four sentences or less in the person's own words - no copy/paste.  I haven't seen those two questions answered properly yet, and if nobody gets it then the answers will be provided later.

[Magluvin]

Perhaps MH would like to go and argue with all these other guy's that say the very same thing i have said,in regards to !what is resonance! ,instead of doing nothing other than providing nothing.

I find it hard to believe in some one that works in such ways,and either gets many things wrong,or misses vital required information when posting in reference to making determinations.
MHs top speed of a car example is a good example of required missing information to make such a determination.
Quote: How do you determine the maximum speed of your car in simple terms?
The answer is the maximum speed of the car is determined from where the maximum horsepower that can be output by the engine is in balance with all of the air friction and various other friction forces.
Although simple,it is incomplete,and a determination of the car's top speed cannot be made from the information provided as MH has clearly stated.
You can see he has only included frictional forces,while leaving out one other force that is vital in determining the top speed of the vehicle. This missing force provides the needed information about the environment in which the car will be traveling in,and without it,the determination cannot be made.

The problem we have here is very large,and can quite easily be seen as disinformation.
This is one of the reasons many people just give up,and one of the reasons man has not progressed any further than he has today. The problem being so called guru's trying to tell you that you are wrong,and are going about things the wrong way--you do not have the correct understanding to progress any further than you have--until you listen to me. These sort of comments come from people that have nothing to show to back up there claim's.They cannot even put together a completed,self presented example of making a simple determination that works. They do not even practice the art them self. They do not even see the effects in existing system's of that they are trying to preach.

These are time waster's,and are here only to make life hard.
They are people that cannot and do not answer there own question's--and yet expect others to answer these questions within days,and to be answered in the same twisted way that the presenter of the questions wants them answered in.

Mag's
I am spending the weekend down the coast a ways,on the boat. But i have begun work on a duel core resonant circuit,and should have it finished around mid week,next week.

Time to move on,as most of us have a grasp on what resonance is,and how it can reduces losses/increase efficiency's in all manor of different systems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzHajoDf1fg

Brad

"These are time waster's,and are here only to make life hard."

Im with ya there 100%.


"They are people that cannot and do not answer there own question's--and yet expect others to answer these questions within days,and to be answered in the same twisted way that the presenter of the questions wants them answered in."

I think there is more to it than that, but thats all Ill say. For now.

Mags