Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief 101

Started by resonanceman, November 22, 2009, 10:18:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.

hoptoad

Quote from: MileHigh on April 12, 2016, 05:23:34 PM
Kiss my aura Dora right here on the floora.  - Frank Zappa
I'd kiss Frank's aura Dora anytime - if he were still alive.
Your aura Dora however is suitable only for wiping my floora.
Cheers

poynt99

Regarding the question about which wave form was the correct one, I'll go out on a limb and say neither one, because I'm pretty sure you inverted CH2 (the current channel), and I did not see mention of this. Therefore the wave forms could not appear as they do with the probe orientation as depicted.

If CH2 was not inverted, the primary current would be lagging the secondary voltage.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

MileHigh

Quote from: hoptoad on April 13, 2016, 08:08:32 PM
I'd kiss Frank's aura Dora anytime - if he were still alive.
Your aura Dora however is suitable only for wiping my floora.
Cheers

Good on the wit, but your comment is still not true.

MileHigh

Quote from: webby1 on April 13, 2016, 03:44:53 PM
Really MH???  please show me where in stiffness the stiffness returns the system back to its original position or state.

No belief needed MH,, I know what I posted and I know you are incorrect.

So you do not want to worry about the exact term,,, why is it that when some other person uses the incorrect term you worry about it and go on and on until you get the term used that you think is correct?

Look MH,, you made an error and I am only pointing it out,, you may not like it but it is the truth.

If you pulled that quote from the link I provided then maybe you are on the path to increase your understanding.

Here is another for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

http://www.synonym.com/synonyms/stiffness

Now look at the antonym,,

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/antonym   just in case you do not know what an antonym is :)

Webby, there are technical and lay definitions for stiffness and elasticity.  I put up a technical definition for stiffness and I am sticking to it.  Can we stop this frivolous debate?  When terms are critical or not all depends on the context.  Duh.

You did not post correct answers.  If you believe you did please link to it and I will have another look.

How about stopping the bad boy routine with the antonym crack?

QuoteIf you pulled that quote from the link I provided then maybe you are on the path to increase your understanding.

You are catching a cold from someone.

MileHigh

Quote from: Pirate88179 on April 13, 2016, 04:36:01 PM

So, in a manner of speaking, in elecronics, resonance would be comparable to a battery or capacitor in that, you do not get out any more energy than was put into the system.  Would this be more or less correct?

I heard a guy on his youtube video "claim" that when he hits resonance in his circuit, that amps and volts go to infinity.  Now, I am not sure just how you could measure infinity amps or infinity volts...he was just using a DMM.

Bill

Resonance is a way of storing energy using AC.  It was a big fish claim.  The only reason you see amplitudes increasing with resonance is if some external source is providing energy, a la pushing a child on a swing.  Eventually the supplied power is equal to the burnt off power in the resonance.  i.e.; maximum resonant amplitude in an resonating electrical circuit typically means maximum power burn-off.