Huge Bombshell !!! - Global Warming Exposed As Scam

[myrmex]

Just for the record, with known physics laws as they are, we can't "use it all up".  Nothing gets used up, it just gets converted.  We have the same amount of everything on this planet we had when it was born, some of it is just in different forms now.  We can covert it back if we so choose.

Bill

It's the same dilemnia we have with overunity ..if we could simply retransform co2 to oil wouldnt we simply stop drilling and plug back our exhaust into our intake ?

The fact remain oil is not cheap energy ... it's the same as a battery and right now we are burning the battery without thinking about refilling it.Everything we have on earth is the same you are right but the amount of time it took to settle it down is a lot longer than the time it take to "use it all up " and we're gonna need a whole lot of solar cell and wind tower to catch the bus.

[Pirate88179]

Not so sure that it's a constant.

30,000 metric tons of cosmic dust adds to the mass of the earth every year.

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Space+dust+may+rain+destruction+on+Earth.-a020629998

.99

I agree.  Good point.  I actually meant the universe but based upon what I typed you are correct.


myrmex:

I don't disagree with your point either.  Those things you mentioned will happen, when it is cost-effective for them to happen.  Unless those other sources of energy are cheaper, either by oil going up or alternative energy going down, there is no reason to change.  This is all market driven and to think that any other forces will change that is not realistic in my opinion.  If we ran out of oil (or ran low) and the price was $2,000/barrel, suddenly you would see a market shift to other methods.  Atomic energy is the cheapest, cleanest energy in the world and while France gets 70% of their energy from nuclear, and many other European countries exceed 50%, we here in the US get only 30% from nuclear.  If they let us build more power plants, we would need a whole lot less oil...but...they won't.  We have not built a new plant in over 30 years and, even if we started on a bunch of them today, they are about 15 years out from going on line.  Time to start now if you ask me.

Bill

[myrmex]

This is what irks me about this we all know how economy works the more you produce of something the cheaper it gets over the time .. similar to plasma tv market where 10 year ago a 32 inch was costing 5000 $ and now are running at 300$..

Solar energy wind energy even nuclear energy follow the same trends as this but oil is volatile ,it is dictated by greedy people who decide and manipulate price as they see fit... Time to act was 100 year ago 

Something i find very interesting for the future are Dr. Klauss Lackner artificial tree using limelight to suck up co2 from air and Rod Vera plasma recycler ( http://www.plasma-wr.com/process.html )  wich could theorically reverse the level of carbon in our wastes.

[jadaro2600]

Has anyone thought about the fact that 200 to 300 years may not be long enough to measure something like global warming?

And yes, I realize that for the last 100 years or so, our means to measure the data has improved.

Using the severity of natural disaster to prove global warming is conjecture.  Natural disasters have been occurring since the beginning.  In the span of what we know as clinically proven science, we have yet to fully document and observe a global one..

We can easily say that one disaster is greater than another - but it's usually measured in lost lives.  ..and if one happens which is in a non-populous region, is it payed much attention to? ( tunguska? )

Postulating the we are witnessing one on the basis of our limited history ( and by this I mean to say that the accuracy of our historical observations falls off dramatically the further we look back ) is a missense of natural trends which lends credibility to a short term claim; the idea then becomes credulous.

[TechStuf]

If one has neither the patience nor inclination to wade into the book below, then consider scrolling down to page 144 and read with an eye to the 2004 Tsunami which claimed over 250,000 lives, and the various Tsunami and increasing earthquakes which have taken place since that time....

http://www.habtheory.com/3/thebook.htm

And further, with an eye toward what has been occurring since that time:


http://www.isuma.tv/lo/en/inuit-knowledge-and-climate-change-project/earth-has-shifted

http://divulgence.net/Sun%20angle.html

http://www.thetreeofliberty.com/vb/showthread.php?t=80886&page=10

http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthmonitor/polarmotion/2006_wobble_anomaly.htm

http://www.zetatalk.com/index/earthrv9.htm

http://axischange.wordpress.com/2007/08/09/earth

http://www.eh2r.com



TS