Ultracaps tested for excess energy

[gadgetmall]

@ Paul. I read your experiment . There is something wrong with your joule thief . I would like to send you one free of charge for Christmas  if you accept. There is no way it went dead that fast unless it was not tuned properly with your primary windings . remember we have Studied the thing of the Goldmine Toroid so 11 is the proper turns on that one . It may not be on another one and unless you know how to do it well them it will run ineffectual for what we are doing . . None of three replications are dead on any of mine running for weeks and weeks , I would rather give you one i know works with the parts i use  except for the batter . They are at Wallmart ,on sale AA 2500 Ni/mh Energizer two pack for 9.95 . they also have c and d cells same price !! This is what i use and i tried one in my camera after three weeks of running a Jt heater and it took pictures still so there  is plenty of power available even after three weeks of steady Bcap Charging and recycling . I also got my Max 856's today so I'm building just the Ou part of a controller until a Boards arrive to me  populated in a week or so . It will contain the PIC to control discharge to a load .. Let me know and Pm me your Address if interested ?One more thing comes to mind .A secondary running leds reduces the amount of current the primary requires . yep its reverse of what you would think so if you don't add it it might be another problem causer .

Albert

[PaulLowrance]

Hi,

The only thing I can think of is my NiMH battery was 700mAh and yours is 2500mAh.

I can email you my address, but no PM because someone periodically logs into my account and checks my PM's. So they might be doing it to yours ass well.

[gadgetmall]

Hi,

The only thing I can think of is my NiMH battery was 700mAh and yours is 2500mAh.

I can email you my address, but no PM because someone periodically logs into my account and checks my PM's. So they might be doing it to yours ass well.

Ill go to your contact me link on your Blog and give you and email or just use this one . fusionchip@yahoo.com

[tinu]

@ Bill,

I appreciate your experiments but it can not change the status of Earth battery. Earth battery is a useless piece of technology. Its applicability was low even in times when electricity was a rare commodity.

Few aspects defining the main characteristics of an Earth battery:
Power is very low. Voltage can not be increased by series connecting two or more batteries.
Internal resistance is very high and, even worst, it is variable.
Battery picks up electrical noises and it can not be shielded in a convenient way.
Cost of setting it up is huge compared to the power it delivers.
Complete and almost unbelievable waste of valuable materials and metals, whereas a regular battery would need only grams or milligrams to perform better.
Electrodes do consume.
Flexibility in use is awful. Zero mobility, etc. etc.

The fact that electrodes catch some currents (either man-made or natural) is not a relevant feature; power so gained is insignificant or the electrodes could have been made from the same material. I’d like to be very clear about this point: the main feature of the contraption is not capturing the telluric currents but generating emf from redox potentials (meaning the contraption is mainly a “battery in a container”, to be more clear). The day an Earth battery will generate power using electrodes made of exactly the same material I will look again into the telluric currents issue but until then it is futile to do it. Until that day, it is just another typical free-energy manipulation: speaking about something (“telluric currents”) that is hidden behind something else (“electrochemical potentials”) and moreover, the well known part of the story (in this  case the “electrochemical potentials”) is twisted around and dragged into dirt (literally here) until no normal person could discern the truth from the lies.

So, I apologize if you felt offended and rest assured that I am not ignorant and that I fully understand the bitter taste you might have felt after conducting some experiments just to find out the final applicability is inexistent. Welcome to the world of shadows and please don’t let the surrounding lies be traps for others.

Cheers,
Tinu

[PaulLowrance]

Oh, also that JT test was only 5% efficient, which explains why the AAA 700mAh battery died so fast. Afterwards I increased the pot resistance to maximum 10Kohm and efficiency increased to over 50%. That's also mentioned in the blog.

So taking that plus your batteries hold 3.6 times as much energy comes to 36. It could last 36 times longer.

Paul