STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[teslaalset]

Oh. there is Excess energy being produced. Well that is good.

The way I see it then, all that need be done is to feed the output back to the input and she is a runner. More out than in (errr used elsewhere to allow output to happen).
As for a release of other energy, I see the toroid just changing the flux direction on one side if the magnet, causing fluctuation in the pickup coil. Sort of like turning an armature to get the same, even though the energy from the hand did not directly generate the output electricity.
I have done quite a bit of this flux path controlling with the Orbonbon and some new tests. But it seems to take at least as much to pulse the toroid as the output ever gets. Maybe Im just not there yet.
It seems the amount of energy it takes to change the flux path enough to cause, things to happen elsewhere, just adds up to as much as it would take to do it another way.

This is just so far with what I have found. Like I said, maybe Im just not there yet.

Mags

A reference indication of the steady state COP is given by Sean of Steorn in this video at approx. 6 minutes :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7i7P63IByY

He indicated that in steady state there is a COP of 1.08
This is where Naudin got his inspiration from most likely.

[Omnibus]

Naudin, as everybody else is underfunded, unfortunately.

[Omnibus]

Wonder if someone can point me to a place in the Boston area or somewhere in New England where they'd have DPO 7104? This type of equipment has to be found urgently so that the proper replication can be vigorously pursued.

[exnihiloest]

Steorn have really brought the research in OU to new heights.
...
Another unfortunate circumstance is that Steorn while offering super high quality scientific research ...

So high that a whole physicists team has denied his effect .

All the Steorn stuff is based on the hypothesis that R*I² represents the losses, R being the coil resistance and I the current in the circuit, i.e. he is neglecting the work done by the coil current to change the electron spin alignment. This energy, like every consumed energy, is seen from the pulse generator as a current in a resistance R' possibly in parallel with R (thus derivating a part of I). It follows that Steorn's approximation is likely an over-estimation of the losses and an under-estimation of the useful energy.

We have not yet proof that Steorn would not be another Lutec, another Minato, another MPI... the only method to prove it, is not to preach good word of OU like the omnibus post but to produce a replicable selfrunning machine. A claim of OU without the evidence of a selfrunning machine is completely vain, we have not to swallow pseudo-scientific garbage.

[Omnibus]

So high that a whole physicists team has denied his effect

That's a lie.