STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[happyfunball]

Steorn is obviously a con I wish theyd go away already. Not a single person has been able to reproduce what they claim to have, it's been four years. I wonder how much money theyve sucked out of investors.

[Omega_0]

Moving on to ver 0.2

Features:

- New rotor 6mm thick acrylic plate mounted on a 25mm ball bearing and 12mm brass bolt as shaft, secured by brass nuts.

- Old rotor converted to base. Got rid of old photo frame as it was too noisy and was troubling neighbors in late nights experiments.

- Runs silent with a thick cloth underneath, without which it tends to move and jump off the table. Low tech solutions at the moment.

- New SMF 12V battery supplying about 500mA @ 600RPM (No optimization)

- Only one core assembly. same old cores.

The scope shot shows heavy cemf, as the magnet pairs are in SN config back again. The hump of cemf shifts with the reed trigger and you can bring it right into the rising edge at the cost of speed loss, where is looks as if not present.
The reason I changed back to SN was, with NN, the repulsion is so strong between the pair that magnets were flying off the rotor at high RPMs, even when secured tightly. I'm VERY afraid now and don't want 1 inch neos flying around in my room...
Further experiments must wait till I find a way to secure the magnets nicely in NN mode.

[exnihiloest]

The above text unnecessarily clogs this discussion. Keep this kind of crap to yourself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

[Omnibus]

Steorn is obviously a con I wish theyd go away already. Not a single person has been able to reproduce what they claim to have, it's been four years. I wonder how much money theyve sucked out of investors.

They are too far ahead of everybody both in their level of equipment and in sophistication of analysis that's why it appears as if not a single person has been able to reproduce what they claim to have. Show results as sophisticated as theirs and then we can talk. Otherwise you have no basis for the above statements and are only wasting the time of the participants in this discussion.

[FatChance!!!]

They are too far ahead of everybody both in their level of equipment and in sophistication of analysis that's why it appears as if not a single person has been able to reproduce what they claim to have. Show results as sophisticated as theirs and then we can talk. Otherwise you have no basis for the above statements and are only wasting the time of the participants in this discussion.

Anybody of whom? The replicating guys of free energy or what???
Any electronic development lab has better or equal equipment as Steorn.
They didn't build their own equipment, it's regular stuff, yet expensive, but that's
is the equipment at my job as well. I work in telecom development and uses
advanced equipment regulary. Don't bullshit us by saying they have equipment that
differs from others and this is should be the reason we can't get the same results.