Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 101 Guests are viewing this topic.

marek

Quote from: PaulLowrance on December 29, 2009, 05:16:44 PM
Hi marek,

Thanks for that important info! I just knew it, that it was due to magnetic viscosity. Since you studied the Steorn patent already, what type of magnetic core do you recommend?

That I don't know, and patent says nothing about that. It just measure system. I think it must be set experimentally. It will depend on operating conditions (rpm, torque). When you look at the torque-flux chart I would try to run it at higher rpm, because you need less energy to desaturate core. But really, it has to be experimented with different cores materials. Worth thing to notice is that maximum torque is in quite narrow range before core, and drops to 0 when passes it. Negative torque too comes later, so maybe the electric pulse can also be lagged, and duty cycle can be reduced... Speculations;)

k4zep

Quote from: PaulLowrance on December 29, 2009, 05:20:41 PM
I just took a look at the Steorn patent, and am amazed that it's all there, like marek said. They show everything from tons of magnetic viscosity plots to the design and theory. Steorn is legit!  :)

http://www.google.com/patents?id=1dOyAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=&f=true

Right on Paul, soneone else finally read the patent!!!!   Reall exellent work...   

Ben

captainpecan

@PaulLowrance,

Yes, groundloop is right.  I always drill my magnets into the rotor whenever possible.  I use a Forester bit. Costs a couple extra dollars, but it makes perfect flat bottomed holes for round magnets.

This is what I was referring to that you can do with that hard drive platter.  This is not my Orbo replication, just a couple pictures of something else I'm working on also.  Hope it helps, it's pretty simple to do, and it lets you easily mount whatever you want to the rotor, while still using that awesome hard drive bearing!

gyulasun

Hi Folks,

Steorn has another patent publication on Torque measurement of a rotating body, see here:
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20090716&CC=WO&NR=2009087476A2&KC=A2


Abstract of  WO 2009087476  (A2)
A system and method is provided for determining the torque and kinetic energy of a rotating body without contacting the rotating body. Graduation markings are applied to mark regular angular displacements on the object. Reflected laser light from the graduations is sensed and converted into a pulsed signal. The pulses of the signal are time stamped and used to determine the velocity of the rotating object at angular displacements which can be less than 360 degrees. Changes in angular velocity during each rotation can be measured and used to determine changes in torque and kinetic energy during each rotation.

rgds, Gyula

callanan

Hi All,

Regarding Steorn's design and claim that the magnet's field on their motor does not induce an emf in the toroid coils, in an ideal world this should be correct. But in the real world nothing is perfect.

Using store bought chokes with few turns will typical keep this induced emf down to the 1-10mV range. But as you all start to wind your own toroid coils on ferrite cores with many more winding turns and winding imperfections then the store bought chokes, this non-ideal induced emf will get larger and typically it can get up to 100mV.

This induced emf due to the coil's imperfection can also make the coil slightly polarity sensitive. Normally, with perfect coils, the polarity of the coil connection does not matter because the direct link between the electrical energy in the coil and the rotor magnet's field is broken. But with imperfect coils where there is a slight induced emf in the coil, this induction creates a link to the rotor magnet's field and will effect the performance of the motor, slightly, depending on the amount of induced emf.

Undertanding this, the induced emf then become very important when using multiple coils around the rotor on your test motor. When you engineer and build your motors, magnet and coil placement as well as even magnet field strength becomes very important. This is because each imperfect coil's induced emf can become additive. But by specially checking for this with a scope and connecting the coils together with specific polarity you can get the induced emf to cancel or reduce to a minimal amount. Typically less then 100 mV for multiple coils.

I have found that my motor performance is optimal when this is done and the trigger is far more stable.

So seeking perfection and accuracy in the design and construction of you your motor is very important if you plan on using more then one toroid coil. I know this holds true for most pulse motors but I though it worthwhile to describe some of the reasons behind it for this motor.

Regards,

Ossie