STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[petersone]

hi GB
Always read your posts with great interest,as I'm sure others do,although a lot of it is over my head,I've been interested in generating rather than a motor,but there are similar probs.Something I've seen,and it's an easy test,if you take a small transformer,with any covers removed from the laminated core and put in some juice in will not magnetize the frame,as I suppose that is the idea,to keep the flux in the core,but if you pass a magnet by it,it will generate,so it seems to be a one way street,just what is wanted to beat Mr Lenz,only prob. is I can only get enough juice to light a couple of small led's.Any thoughts?
peter

[neptune]

So tomorrow is the big day . Steorn is going to prove overunity . My guess is , even if they do , nothing will change . They claim that they encourage replication , but with hold key info. The only way you will gain this info , is to pay for a license , and they will give you the info . Based on their track record , this will take several years. After that , the results of your endeavors will become and remain the PROPERTY OF STEORN. Comments welcome.

[gravityblock]

The quote below is something John Bedini wrote in another thread here.  So, if you have spikes, then it may have potential.  I think this is the reason why Stefan suggested to chop the input current e.g. 10 times during the incoming of the magnets, you would get many more spikes all charging up the battery.  Don't confuse the spikes with BEMF.  I hope your listening Ossie, because this means your system could be a self-runner.

The back emf of the system is always much lower then the input voltage. The spike is the true Radiant energy and it can do things current can not do. It can charge batteries, run motors, light lights and so on. Converting the Radiant energy must be converted in the collector circuit with a semiconductor and not the emitter. You must drain that off to charge something like a capacitor, and then only is it real measurable electricity. So you must understand the system you are trying to build first."

I hope John doesn't mind me quoting him here, it's just really good information and I thought was beneficial here since I attacked BEMF like I did in my earlier posts.  It's easy to confuse BEMF with radiant energy and I thought a distinction between the two was needed.

Petersone, this stuff is over my head also.....you're not alone.

[callanan]

The quote below is something John Bedini wrote in another thread here.  So, if you have spikes, then it may have potential.  I think this is the reason why Stefan suggested to chop the input current e.g. 10 times during the incoming of the magnets, you would get many more spikes all charging up the battery.  Don't confuse the spikes with BEMF.  I hope your listening Ossie, because this means your system could be a self-runner.

I hope John doesn't mind me quoting him here, it's just really good information and I thought was beneficial here since I attacked BEMF like I did in my earlier posts.  It's easy to confuse BEMF with radiant energy and I thought a distinction between the two was needed.

Petersone, this stuff is over my head also.....you're not alone.

Hi GB,


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1868.0;attach=5087


Regards,

Ossie

[gyulasun]

Hi Ossie,

I wonder how much better your setup would work (both in RPM and in charging back) if you did not use the 2.2 Ohm resistor in series with the coils?

I understand it limits coils' current hence protects reed switches from burning in fast but then the number of turns for all the coils could be increased to improve induction and copper resistance would certainly increase --> current gets limited without the resistor.

rgds, Gyula