perpetual motion

[allcanadian]

@scotty1
I am sure Ed.L understood the one point I was trying to make with this post, that we are surrounded by motion everywhere as matter and energy. We can debate semantics that a top may slow or matter may convert to energy or vice versa but the fact remains motion persists eternally. As Tesla once said---"Is this energy static or kinetic! If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic â€" and this we know it is, for certain â€" then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature."
Regards
AC

[scotty1]

"They are in constant motion, they are running one kind of magnets
against the other kind, and if guided in the right channels they possess perpetual power." Ed. L
--------------
I'm sure they'll figure it out one day.
Tesla said the day we discover what electricity is will be the most important in the history of the human race.
Still waiting 
Cheers mate.
Scotty.
http://leedskalnin.net/

[FreeEnergy]

http://www.duschl-engineering.de/Fac...otion%2038.pdf

Above URL does not work.

[sm0ky2]

... common sense rationalization of how absurd the general arguement is against perpetual motion.

This gets to the very heart of the matter, the fact that many people have confused the context and terminology relating to perpetual motion. Physics states catagorically that everything is in perpetual motion--period, but this does not mean anything has gained energy in any way, the conservation of energy will continue to hold true as it should.
Regards
AC

conservation of energy only holds true " unless acted on by an outside force". and since in the universe we live in, there is no place where there is "nothing. very where we look we find "something". even the 'vacuum' of space is filled with all kinds of things, and is not even a true "vacuum". There is no such thing as a "closed system".

a nucleus that's missing an electron is sitting in empty space.
and electron is nearby.
the electron will accelerate, gaining all kinds of energy until it reaches its eatheric-threshhold, which is at just under the speed of light in most situations. (can be greater than sometimes)
and enters a state of (almost) perpetual  motion.
i say almost becase over time, the sub-sub-particles [ ed refers to these as "tiny magnets"] become neutral in charge within the proton, and eventually it will decay, and so will the associated force attracting the electron, and said electron will shoot off in a tangential-line towards its next destination. we refer to this currently as the atoms "half-life", since we dont have a way yet to measure the discrete magnetic energy of the atomic nucleii within a given sample.

an aetheric distortion can cause a sub-sub-particle (and its opposite polarity) to manifest and either of these can attach itself to a set of sub-sub-particles and/or attach to a nearby unstable isotope, forming into a different type of atom. This atom would have additional energy that can attract a free electron, and set it into (almost) perpetual motion for many years, sometimes hundreds of thousands of years or more depending on the atomic structure.

we can ionize the atom and take this electron away.
and another electron will gain an incredible ammount of energy and the process repeates itself.

we can go down smaller than that, the quarks that make up the nucleus, are forming a magnetic path. very similar to the perpetual motion holder, just without the switch. the sub-sub particles within the quark are forming a magnetic path within the quark that determines the (+) energy flowing throuhg the atomic structure.
this is why it "radiates". this also determines the number of electrons that will be sustained in orbital paths around it, wether or not it can support a neutral quark-set (neutron), and subsequently, the "type" of atom it is.

we can go down smaller than that, the sub-sub-particles are made from aetheric-pairs (+/-, south, north) that manifest directly from the aether. a vast sea of infinite energy. this happens everywhere all the time. they generally crash into each other, in varrying number forming sub-sub-particles, and their opposites, which crash into each other (sometimes forming larger groups, such as sub-particles) then disentegrate back into the eather in a crash of energy, that (by mass) is greater than a nuclear reaction by a power of ^100,000.

occasionally, the circumstances prevail where these sub-sub-particles group together and do not crash into their opposite polarity. this forms a sub-particle. within which a magnetic path is formed. this too radiates energy, and its energy determines the path the electron will follow around the atom, and which other sub-particles it can attach to it, and in which direction.

Since space is never truly "empty", we do not find anything that is truly in "perpetual motion". but since there is (from our perspective)infinite energy all around us,  everything is always "moving".

While thermodynamic theory may hold true in a macro application
( in a newtonian sort of way...), we do not even have the ability to put it to the test, much less have anything that we can actually apply thermodynamic theory to. there's always energy from outside the system interfering with it. however small we may percieve it to be.

there were people, long before our current recorded history that knew much more about this than we do now. theres no telling how many times man has progressed technologically. then something happened that destroyed it all.

think about the majority of the people in the world right now.
and how much they actually "know".
if a catastrophe occured, and society as we know it became dismantled... almost all of our knowledge would be lost.
and studied, misinterpreted, misconceived by future historians.

all we know is what we've done inthe past 5 to 6 thousand years.
yet there is evidence of advanced societies existing tens of thousands of years before that, and evidence that man has been here much longer as a whole.

there is a trail of knowledge, passed down by people that didnt know what to do with it, and it contains clues about science and technology that mankind may not fully come to grasp with until our grandkids are our age. if we make it that long.

The energy that causes perpetual motion is infinite (at least as far are we are concerned, universally regional). What we are after, is like tapping into "the hand that is spinning the top".

causing aetheric distortions, and using the energy from the (+/-) pairs, the "tiny magnets" that are flowing through everything, even you and I right now.
but we dont have to go down that small. the same rules apply even to the larger groups, just as they to to the sub-sub-sub-atomic pairs that generate out of the eather.
just as they do to a large magnet you hold in your hand

if you create a similar scenerio to the atom, with magnets you can not only create "perpetual motion", but also you can extract a massive ammount of energy from the acceleration of the "electron" magnet that is orbiting.

actually doing this, is a technological brick-wall, but there are ways around that, to create exponential acceleration. similar to the work of David Hammell, by using only a portion of the orbital path.
This does not violate Thermodynamic Theory, the theory simply does not apply in this system, because there is outside influence from the eather that give the "tiny magnets" magnets their initial energy. and there is litterally billions of billions of them inside a small magnet. and about 1/3 as many in "perpetual motion" through the center of the magnet and around its sides.

[FreeEnergy]

similar to the work of David Hammell, by using only a portion of the orbital path.
This does not violate Thermodynamic Theory, the theory simply does not apply in this system, because there is outside influence from the eather that give the "tiny magnets" magnets their initial energy. and there is litterally billions of billions of them inside a small magnet. and about 1/3 as many in "perpetual motion" through the center of the magnet and around its sides.

Sean CLaNZeR's Hamel Spinner:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3B9XfM0jwA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gcu2X3rTTes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW2hbMeod1o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2kz3DYpZdI