perpetual motion

[FreeEnergy]

So all I need is a David Hammell spinning device and somehow apply a small electrical current (dc/ac?) to this device to get more output in the form of kinetic energy?  how exactly?  or i am completely off?

[sm0ky2]

So all I need is a David Hammell spinning device and somehow apply a small electrical current (dc/ac?) to this device to get more output in the form of kinetic energy?  how exactly?  or i am completely off?

hmm...  perhaps you could position a coil off-centered with respect to the 'magnetic center', in such a way that the EMF pushes the magnet away from the center, and maintains the imbalance, while generating electricity at the same time.

just dont let your load overpower the force between the two (well now 3 actually) interacting magnetic fields.

[FreeEnergy]

hmm...  perhaps you could position a coil off-centered with respect to the 'magnetic center', in such a way that the EMF pushes the magnet away from the center, and maintains the imbalance, while generating electricity at the same time.

just dont let your load overpower the force between the two (well now 3 actually) interacting magnetic fields.

a few pulses at a time would be best i guess, not sure.

[FreeEnergy]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ttm13AyiMs

[david lambright]

Physicists Measure Elusive 'Persistent Current'

Ecnmag.com - October 14, 2009

New Haven, Conn. â€" Physicists at Yale University have made the first
definitive measurements of “persistent current,” a small but perpetual
electric current that flows naturally through tiny rings of metal wire
even without an external power source.

The team used nanoscale cantilevers, an entirely novel approach, to
indirectly measure the current through changes in the magnetic force it
produces as it flows through the ring. “They’re essentially little
floppy diving boards with the rings sitting on top,” said team leader
Jack Harris, associate professor of physics and applied physics at Yale.
The findings appear in the October 9 issue of Science.

The counterintuitive current is the result of a quantum mechanical
effect that influences how electrons travel through metals, and arises
from the same kind of motion that allows the electrons inside an atom to
orbit the nucleus forever. “These are ordinary, non-superconducting
metal rings, which we typically think of as resistors,” Harris said.
“Yet these currents will flow forever, even in the absence of an applied
voltage.”

Although persistent current was first theorized decades ago, it is so
faint and sensitive to its environment that physicists were unable to
accurately measure it until now. It is not possible to measure the
current with a traditional ammeter because it only flows within the tiny
metal rings, which are about the same size as the wires used on computer
chips.

Past experiments tried to indirectly measure persistent current via the
magnetic field it produces (any current passing through a metal wire
produces a magnetic field). They used extremely sensitive magnetometers
known as superconducting quantum interference devices, or SQUIDs, but
the results were inconsistent and even contradictory.

“SQUIDs had long been established as the tool used to measure extremely
weak magnetic fields. It was extremely optimistic for us to think that a
mechanical device could be more sensitive than a SQUID,” Harris said.

The team used the cantilevers to detect changes in the magnetic field
produced by the current as it changed direction in the aluminum rings.
This new experimental setup allowed the team to make measurements a full
order of magnitude more precise than any previous attempts. They also
measured the persistent current over a wider range of temperature, ring
size and magnetic field than ever before.

“These measurements could tell us something about how electrons behave
in metals,” Harris said, adding that the findings could lead to a better
understanding of how qubits, used in quantum computing, are affected by
their environment, as well as which metals could potentially be used as
superconductors.

Authors of the paper include Ania Bleszynski-Jayich, William Shanks,
Bruno Peaudecerf, Eran Ginossar, Leonid Glazman and Jack Harris (all of
Yale University) and Felix von Oppen (Freie Universität Berlin).

Cheers.
Scotty.
Sounds like Ed's PMH...

hi everyone...my name is david lambright and i have some information you might find interesting...i have been experimenting with PMHs, using iron oxide as the core...i found a U shaped ferrite core in an old TV, and with 5 wraps of wire and a steel keeper on top, was able to get a "lock" with a 9.6v makita battery.....in another experiment, i filled an aluminum tube with black iron oxide, and bent it int o a circle [toroid], and taped the ends together making a continuous oxide core with an aluminum outer skin....i energized this rig just like an ED PMH, with a coil of insulated wire and a battery.....now there is a persistent flow of energy through the oxide core....this creates a visible distortion around the rig...it looks like a mirage or heat, but like a film or bubble....because this is now visible, i can see and study how this energy flows...if i use two of these devices, the energy flows between the rings always in a spiral....i will be making a video of this device soon and will post the link if anyone is interested....david