Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power

[gotoluc]

Oh... now I get what Khwartz was talking about!... I could not get why he was talking about dividing

I was not using / to divide but to separate amps and hours. Is it not an abbreviation for per

Thanks Poit for pointing this out

Luc

[Khwartz]

Yeh, the correct typing would be mathematically "amps.hours" (abreged amps * hours, or amps times hours) because as you noticed yourself we obtain it by multiplying the duration by the current draw. This gives the "charge" equivalent through a ratio to coulombs. And multiply again by the voltage, we get the energy.

But in english it used to be written "amps-hours".

That why I said there was a confusion while using "/" which indeed means dividing as is maths than in physics

But, contrarely I said at my last post: A/h means nothing at all of special in physics.

Cheers.

[gotoluc]

Okay, from now on I'll write A/h and not amps/hour to describe a battery bank Amps capacity for one hour.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention

Luc

[Khwartz]

Well, looks for example at Wiki: it is "Ah" (or A.h if you want); for the very same reasons but you'te welcome Luc

[hanon]

Hi Gotoluc and all,

I think that this same idea is what Clemente Figuera used in his overunity generator according to his patent http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/patente_1908.pdf .

Instead of a motor he built a generator with two lateral electromagnets. He fed them with two unphased waves (!!): when the first signal was at maximun the other was at minimun, and then  steadily he moved the fields until reaching minimun in the first and maximun intensity in the second. Figuera never stated clearly the pole orientation, but after watching your device I am quite sure that he used like poles facing each other. Figuera called the magnets as N rectangle and S rectangle, but maybe he was hidding the real pole orientation.

I hope this helps to share some ideas between both concepts