Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power

[Khwartz]

Thanks for your post Shylo

I have no schooling, so I experiment to understand how things work. I found this about 7 years ago when I built a motor out of 2 MOT secondaries with a ceramic permanent magnet rotor. I still have that build if anyone wants to see it.

Ever since then I assumed it was common knowledge and would mention it here and there but now I'm finding out it's not common knowledge at all. I've just been told it's not in the textbooks.

If experimenters would like to test it, I would suggest a MOT secondary since it's more difficult to detect the poles with a round coil. You need a long strait side of a coil which separates the poles and makes it easily detectable. Also, best if the coil winding width and height are the same, so a square Brooks winding is best.

Please note as I have mentioned in my video that the center opening pole will be stronger because they are double together and in close proximity as opose to the outside poles away from each other but if you combine the two outside opposite poles (as I do in my MMM design) they are as strong as the inner pole.

So now you can double the torque of a coil if you understand this and know how to use it.

Luc

I am amazed again by the Power of you Intuition, Luc, and your obvious to me capability to look accurately at things

[teslaedison]

just check this link out guys at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XsZG-6Lp1o


oh wow really check this out all
Tom

[tinman]

just check this link out guys at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XsZG-6Lp1o


oh wow really check this out all
Tom

I see you are here just to peddle your religion. Please tell us all what this has to do with Luc's project?--> maybe take your rubbish else where.

[gotoluc]

I've already sent Stefan a PM and requested to delete this post and user to be moderated.

Luc

[shylo]

Excellent demo, i-ron, So really the magnetic field in the coil is positioned  on a 45 deg. angle to the 2 surfaces?
This contridicts' what Luc is saying , about 2 fields being present ?  equally but both norths in the middle ,souths on the outside?
Maybe it depends on the field your looking at it?
Very interesting stuff.
artv