Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power

Started by gotoluc, December 07, 2009, 05:32:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Quote from: Magluvin on August 26, 2014, 11:04:22 PM

..... The CA is just like resin, its not real strong unless its with fiber, what ever it may be.


Mags

Glass fiber, carbon fiber, 16awg wire. :o   lol   All that wire glued solid, would be a copper brick. ;) No glass needed.  ;) ;D

Mags

gotoluc

Thanks guys

I'll look into it Mags but epoxy and cloth is not a big deal for me as I'm building a houseboat, so I've got lots.

Yep, a real monster of a coil!... first one this big and heavy I've ever built. Must be over 5 pounds. If this design has any value it would be worth making the coils with copper clad aluminum wire to save on weight.

Luc

wattsup


Khwartz

Quote from: tinman on August 24, 2014, 05:46:22 AM
The torque of an electric motor is measured exactly as i did it.We are measuring static rotor torque.Torque is a measure of rotational or "twisting" force. I can dig up my torque dial if you like,and show you that the results will be exactly the same for the P/in we used.
Dear Brad, there are 3 distincts concepts here:

1. "Shaft torque",

2. "Rotor torque",

3. "Moment", or just "torque",

and as more we differenciate the concepts more we allow us to be accurate and so not leading to misinterpretations, so wastes of time, good to clear up the differences in between. So,

• "Shaft torque" is about twisting the axis,

• "Rotor torque" is about the reaction of the fluid against the rotation of the rotor (like for helicopters rotors),

•  "Moment" is "the rotational force times meter" reduced to the center of rotation when there is rotation of course (which is on the axis necessarily). This moment corresponds to "torque" when nothing is specified.

So yes, indeed, your way to measure the "torque" (definition 3) is absolutely correct but not your way to interpret it. YOU DO NOT MEASURE "TORQUE" BY YOUR READING ON YOUR PONY-BRAKE, YOU ONLY MEASURE THE "ROTATIONAL FORCE" (or "TANGENTIAL FORCE") AT A SPECIFIC RADIUS.

To get the "torque", or "moment", YOU DO NEED THEN TO MULTIPLY IT BY THE LENGH IN METERS. (To have directly the reading on the pony-brake you would need to set a 1 meter radius disk, not just been 1:1 with the radius of the rotor ^_^).

For more details about these concepts see for example:

http://books.google.fr/books?id=FiEapaNgjLcC&pg=PA423&lpg=PA423&dq=%22rotor+torque%22+definition&source=bl&ots=NIXpY_U_yw&sig=JH7FFM3jvQLjFDj6Z2aMOnjEfjY&hl=fr&sa=X&ei=wmj9U5z5LoHtaL7fgtAO&ved=0CCsQ6AEwBzgK


http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=571073

Otherwise, still your idea of torque measurements and comparisons looks to me most relevant in the case of the Luc's MMM :)

Regards,
Didier.

Khwartz

Quote from: telecom on August 24, 2014, 09:45:57 AM
How can be they so great if voltage varies and there is always a small charge remaining?
Hi telecom, needn't we just the difference of voltage between the start of the experiment and the end? as per:

W [Joule] = 0.5 × C [F] × (E1[Volts] - E2 [Volts])^2

Isn't the variations in between not relevant?