Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Gravity wheel of Mikhail Dmitriyev

Started by hartiberlin, December 08, 2009, 01:45:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Oh, and, by the way, you probably prefer to be held hostage to Mikhail Dmitriyev's unsustained fantasies?

Omnibus

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on February 03, 2011, 03:14:27 PM
you're ridiculous... there are no "different rules" in logic. ::) you are totally confused, you don't understand what a cogent argument is... a cogent argument is a cogent argument whether it be presented in scientific circles or judicial circles.

again, tu stultus es...  q.e.d

That is completely wrong as it concerns the judicial system in the states. You are the confused one. I repeat, the goal of a court proceeding in the states is not the search for the objective truth and that shapes the way argumentation is presented. It is totally different from scientific argumentation aimed at establishing nothing else but the objective truth.

WilbyInebriated

Quote from: Omnibus on February 03, 2011, 03:15:17 PM
Oh, and, by the way, you probably prefer to be held hostage to Mikhail Dmitriyev's unsustained fantasies?
i would imagine so. i doubt he came to a thread titled "Gravity wheel of Mikhail Dmitriyev" to hear your ridiculous notions on logical fallacies...  ::)
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

WilbyInebriated

Quote from: Omnibus on February 03, 2011, 03:20:16 PM
That is completely wrong as it concerns the judicial system in the states. You are the confused one. I repeat, the goal of a court proceeding in the states is not the search for the objective truth and that shapes the way argumentation is presented. It is totally different from scientific argumentation aimed at establishing nithing else but the objective truth.
you are totally confused and your response is irrelevant. the logic used in debating in either is one and the same... if you can demonstrate that a different system of logic is being used, then have at it, otherwise just shut up. repeating your assertion over an over does not make it true.

again tu stultus es... q.e.d.
There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater...
the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public.  - Mr. Universe

Omnibus

Even the finding of clear evidence can be  dismissed in court if the finding wasn't done according to certain rules of reasonable grounds for the search.