Gravity wheel of Mikhail Dmitriyev

[WilbyInebriated]

Don't project onto others what applies to you. Your education is deficient and you are the one lacking mental capacity.

As for concrete examples, I leave them to you, as a homework. There are plenty of examples in the intrinsic sense, let alone the travesty aspect. As a matter of fact, the Hamilton's equations are one such concrete example but you're not equipped to understand my argument, as was seen. So, you're the one lacking knowledge and ability to understand what I'm saying but are blaming me for your deficiencies. What a stupid situation you've put yourself in.

you have no idea what my education is...

as i said earlier, hamilton's equations are irrelevant to the debate between you and i. you are the one lacking in the ability to point out any intrinsic differences... please define the method used that is not inductive or deductive reasoning. please give an example of a strong case and a weak case of this 'omni' method. including the various (if any) types of this 'omni' method would be helpful as well. but, you lack the knowledge and ability to do so, and so you blame your deficiencies on me...

or continue with your evasion via logical fallacies...

[Omnibus]

Like I said, you're not equipped to comprehend the examples I can give. That's evident. Case in point --  the Hamiltonian equations problem. That's one relevant example but you can't even appreciate it neither do you like it. Therefore, you have to look for your own examples following the instructions I gave you.

Now, like I said, you're continuing to be a nuisance in this thread because you lack self-respect. I tolerated you for quite a while but I'm warning you, I'll cut you off if you continue nagging. Try to comprehend what I'm saying. Try to come up with examples along the lines I instructed you and do something positive. You can't expect to be spoon fed and to advance at the same time. You have to put some effort of your own too.

[Omnibus]

Now, to help you a little bit. Think about postulates or axioms. Are they a result of deductive or inductive reasoning? How about political doctrines or ethics of good and bad? Think about aesthetical ideals. What is beauty, is it a result of deductions or inductions? The list may go on and on. Do you need more help? Are these tips enough? So far all this is outside the taboos. What are the taboo topics in soft sciences a result of -- are they progeny of inductive or deductive reasoning?

[Omnibus]

When OJ was let go was that a result of inductive or deductive logic and has it anything to do with the objective truth? Will you agree the validity of Ohm's law to be decided by your neighbors, the bus driver, the teller in the bank and the shoeshine boy?

[spinn_MP]

Congrats! Just over the last few days, several hundreds of new BS posts...