Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Buoyancy/gravity wheel - another approach?

Started by Low-Q, December 28, 2009, 05:29:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Just an idea:
Let there be plenty of buoyant objects in that tube. They cannot be so buoyant that they cannot submerge after a free fall from the top of the tube or reservoir. Imagine ice cubes.
A guide will guide them back into the tube in the moment they are submerged and still in motion. A torpedo shaped object will be good for reducing water resistance.
Now, let all the buoyant objects in the tube use their combined buoyancy to push one object at the time out of the tube. While that pushed object leaves the tube, it must fall down, submerge, be guided back into the tube. Now there is enough buoyant objects in the tube to push next one out of the tube.
The valves are in theory an effortless operation. At least one cannot take the energy they require to open and close into consideration. This energy requirement has nothing to do with the buoyant system.
We need only two valves because the tube must maintain the water column all the time.


I have not made my calculus on this one, but nature usually don't give a shit about what we believe or conclude. So what's left is to do the practical experiment.


This far, I am just confused.

EDIT: I did't notice the video link above when I posted this. It appears to be the same idea...  ;D

Vidar

Low-Q

Another idea that is similar but don't need buoyancy:
Valved control the water level, and keeps the water to one side.
Displaced water is the working medium. Torque of the hub depends on the displaced water, not the weight of the spheres.
Looking forward to another sleepless night...because I cannot figure out at the moment why this wouldn't work "perpetual".
I will definitely work for a while, until water is leveled out - or something...



Low-Q

I have had a hard working week, very tired, but I got it now; When the sphere enter the water at the bottom, water level rise at the bottom.
When the sphere exit the water on top, water level descent at the top.
As the cycle continue, the water level will finally equalize...


So, no, it will not be OU. :-\

tagor

Quote from: fredenergie on July 02, 2015, 12:22:30 PM
sorry no abituer the forum, how I can remove about thank you ???

ask help to the admin of this forum

fredenergie