Hairpin Project

[sparks]

Of course there is energy bound in the electron orbital as it is mass in motion.  When this angular momentum is converted to linear acceleration then we get current.  The trick to seperating the electron orbital momentum into usable current is to impose upon the atomic structure of an element or molecule a very polarized field of short duration.  Copper or anything that has an abundance of free electrons is unable to give us what we need and that is the conversion of bound electrons into free electrons.  Conductors have way too many free electrons to begin with.  Good for collision currents bad for atomic gains.  Tesla was getting his electron binding energies from nitrogen atoms. Copper is a good conductor but a bad scource element.
Another way to look at an electron is a standing wave.  This would be an oscillation with a defined wavelength nodes antidnodes harmonics etc.  The frequency of which must be exceedingly high due to the distance between the electron shell and the neucleus.  But if we are able to generate a really high energy photon of a very short wavelength this would disrupt the standing wave representation of the electron.  The electron standing wave density would become less dense with a resultant photon emission of greater intensity than that input by the scource ionizing radiation.

[Magluvin]

Hey Resman
In this picture, do you see anything familliar?

Mags

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Of course there is energy bound in the electron orbital as it is mass in motion.  When this angular momentum is converted to linear acceleration then we get current.  The trick to seperating the electron orbital momentum into usable current is to impose upon the atomic structure of an element or molecule a very polarized field of short duration.  Copper or anything that has an abundance of free electrons is unable to give us what we need and that is the conversion of bound electrons into free electrons.  Conductors have way too many free electrons to begin with.  Good for collision currents bad for atomic gains.  Tesla was getting his electron binding energies from nitrogen atoms. Copper is a good conductor but a bad scource element.
Another way to look at an electron is a standing wave.  This would be an oscillation with a defined wavelength nodes antidnodes harmonics etc.  The frequency of which must be exceedingly high due to the distance between the electron shell and the neucleus.  But if we are able to generate a really high energy photon of a very short wavelength this would disrupt the standing wave representation of the electron.  The electron standing wave density would become less dense with a resultant photon emission of greater intensity than that input by the scource ionizing radiation.

you are using classical physics to describe an electron but electrons do not follow classical mechanics.

an electron is statically 'smeared' in its orbit it does not 'revolve' around an atom. it pretty much looks like a perfect soap bubble and multiple electrons around a complex atom looks like a soap bubble inside a soap bubble inside a soap bubble and on and on. this soap bubble can change shape according to pressure exerted on its field, only 'free' electrons can become point particles and or wave particles.

the only way to make bound electrons become point particles is to drop the temperature down to where the electron has little or no energy but then they tend to act as singularities and become BEC.

electrons are inherently lazy and won't do work unless you force them to do work. like with 'all' forms of energy, it only likes the path of 'least' resistance. this is the reason why electrons smear themselves around an atom is so they do not have to do work revolving around an atom such as that described in classical mechanics. they are lazy conservative slaves!

[resonanceman]

Hey Resman
In this picture, do you see anything familliar?

Mags

Mags

Is that  a picture of part of someones hairpin?

I see 2 HV caps  and a  sealed sparkgap like we talked about/

gary

[Magluvin]

Hey Resman
Its a pic of Don Smiths device. I was hammered to see it.  I have been looking into the Bertonee transformers but no luck. I wanted to see what that bolt connection was. There are already 2 thick neon wires coming out, and I assume those are the output, but that terminal may be a gnd.   But it was interesting to see that there.
I hope it is a spark gap function.

Mags