Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump

[minde4000]

Regarding to this particular 45 degree angle requirement:

       RADIUS = HEIGHT


Minde

Edit EXEMPLE:

                    Given:                   Radius = 2.25"        H=R=2.25"
                                               
                                                In this case 1/6th of circle perimeter will be P=(2*PI*R)/6=2.355"
                                                According to phytagoren theorem C(sq)=A(sq)+B(sq)
                                                C(sq)=P(sq)+6.25"
                                                C=3.43" ( single wire strand length top-to-bottom @ 45 degrees )

[mflynn44]

Just some thoughts about the geometry of Agentgates device.

Many people here have built devices, some with rotating magnetic fields, that have voltage available at the output but no power. One basic problem has always been power out.

I think the geometry of Agentgates device combined with the pulsed input is creating a complex rotating magnetic field. The field is rotating in a circular motion around the device but also an up and down wave motion across the secondary according to the pulsed input. This cutting across the secondary by the flux lines is what was missing in other devices and is where the power comes from.

Agentgates device will work with a single primary but three or four primaries are better and the pulse rate should have control over the power out.

Would it not make sense to just have the 3 primaries in series? I see from the beginning that the size of the primary keeps getting thinner as to reduce the ohms to reduce load current.
But we really dont know for sure that the spacing is optimum. Where do we have info to determine that criteria? Maybe it need an inch between windings. Maybe an inch and a half. 

If anyone has the equipment to test, a single primary, or even just a length of wire should show a continued dc output after the pulse is removed. If what is being said about the dc on the secondary is so.
Now if we confirm that there is a continuation of dc after the pulse, then we lay down a second length of wire next to the first and see what distance causes the inertial dc to be lessened. This will determine the spacing.
A good scope should be able to show what is happening in the wire after the pulse is removed. If it works at 100hz to what ever hz then the effect should be clear in the test I have laid out. And then string another wire across that lengths of primary at various angles to test the affect on the secondary to get a proper angle settings.
Again, at 100hz or 1000 hz, a scope should indicate what is happening.
I dont have a scope. But these are the experiments I would have gone for as I stated earlier in this thread.

Magthinks

[Mk1]

@agentgates

Thanks for the answer , i will still have to figure it out , my math is rusty . it looks Chinese to me lol

@spp-48 @altair @minde

Thank for the answer , but i got that far , the problem with your answers , is that you need to make 36 lap at 10 degrees apart , but not got over the same path twice . You will have to see what i mean , it need a offset of about 10 degrees at the 18 turn to not double it self .

[szaxx]

36 slots wound at 45 degs the end of the first loop is 1 slot further along than the start position. when filled ,1 coil, the ends meet up. Is this correct as it fits perfectly.

steve.

[agentgates]

Thanks for the answer , i will still have to figure it out , my math is rusty . it looks Chinese to me lol

What is the diameter of your device? Multiply it with 3.14 and divide the whole thing with 6.

PI= 3.14