Solid State Orbo System

[synchro1]

@Bruce,

Your schematic has two toroids intersecting the stator, but no third magnet. Place the toroids above and below a third magnet in the middle, between the magnet and the stators, then place the output coil on one side only, and leave the other side open. Then when you activate the flux blocking toroids, 3.5 times the flux is directed through the coil wrapped armature to one side. Naturally, the stator would need to be shaped larger in the middle to fit the toroids above and below the middle magnet.

[Bruce_TPU]

@Bruce,

Your schematic has two toroids intersecting the stator, but no third magnet. Place the toroids above and below a third magnet in the middle, between the magnet and the stators, then place the output coil on one side only, and leave the other side open. Then when you activate the flux blocking toroids, 3.5 times the flux is directed through the coil wrapped armature to one side. Naturally, the stator would need to be shaped larger in the middle to fit the toroids above and below the middle magnet.

Hi Synchro,

Like this?   

[gotoluc]

@Bruce,

Your schematic has two toroids intersecting the stator, but no third magnet. Place the toroids above and below a third magnet in the middle, between the magnet and the stators, then place the output coil on one side only, and leave the other side open. Then when you activate the flux blocking toroids, 3.5 times the flux is directed through the coil wrapped armature to one side. Naturally, the stator would need to be shaped larger in the middle to fit the toroids above and below the middle magnet.

Hi synchro1,

when I suggested to use the Flyn Parallel Path design with the coils on each end I was also suggesting to use a constant polarity flip AC circuit like an H-bridge circuit. This way each coil will go from zero flux to 3.5 times flux. Do you not think this would work?

Thanks for your help

Luc

[Cap-Z-ro]

With such a small air gap...would not thin cardboard or thick paper allow for a smaller gap, and prevent debris from clogging up the gap at a later time ?

This is an excellent example of lateral thinking BTW.

Regards...

[synchro1]

@Bruce,

Nice work! I realized that all one need to do is to increase the diameter of the middle disk neos between the toroids, to equal the strength of two stacks on each side and allow for the space needed to fit the toroids in between. Also, based on Paul Noel's idea of "Backdraft", it would be possible for the first air gaped armature to act as a middle magnet for a second larger parallel path apparatus, now coupled to a T shape, providing over ten times the flux force in the larger armature coil to one side. I also noticed your schematic has the second unwound armature on the other side. That one has to leave. The amplification of force by this kind of coupling presents a real solid chance to go overunity.

@Luc

Based on a study of Wesley Gary's analysis of the neutral zone and his application to the fluctuating armature on his pole shifting generator, there is one current generated when the armature is polarized, and another when the magnetic field colapses. There seems to be no advantage to re polarizing in the opposite direction, as the current generated the other way is the same as the first. Bad news for grounloop's new project. One way to zero is as good as pole reversal. With the coupling approach, half the pulses would yield five times the force to one side and save some burned out DPDT switches at the very least. One can see how a nano watt IC could switch giga Gauss of magnet force with enlargement and reduction of the bridge couplings scale. Perhaps a good power plant for a high voltage lifter. Also I believe the switching of the toroids would encounter less eddy interference then the standard Flynn magnetic wraps switched back and forth.