Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Solid State Orbo System

Started by Groundloop, January 06, 2010, 12:21:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 ... 148
User actions

Bruce_TPU

#285
February 21, 2010, 02:51:15 PM
Afternoon ALL,

As I continue my methodical build of my SSG1 Solid State Generator v.1.  My bars are filed and sanded.  Toroid is picked up at the Post Office on Monday and now I work on an improved circuit for my Steorn Magnet Motor. 

@ Alex

If you would like me to make you a toroid using my unusual ingredients, I gladly will, if you would like to test it and post the results.  My treat!  Just tell me the size that you would like, or a bar or both.

Cheers,

Bruce
http://www.energyfreedomreport.com
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

Omega_0

#286
February 21, 2010, 03:35:43 PM
Quote from: Bruce_TPU on February 21, 2010, 02:51:15 PM
Afternoon ALL,

As I continue my methodical build of my SSG1 Solid State Generator v.1.  My bars are filed and sanded.  Toroid is picked up at the Post Office on Monday and now I work on an improved circuit for my Steorn Magnet Motor. 

If you don't mind, I'd like to suggest some modifications.
The air gap should be on the core side (both top and bottom), and it is necessary. Without it you will find that the core will never "disappear" completely or it will consume a lot of current. You can also make the gap variable, because there will be a tradeoff, which you can find only by experimenting.

I don't see any need of air gap on the pickup side. You want all flux to flow into the pickup for max output. I wonder why you put it there.
Edit: Now I see the need of this gap. See below posts.

Second, the core should be completely wound. This will reduce input current, and as the core must not touch the poles, there is no point leaving that space without copper.

All the best, and keep posting those vids. :)
I have more respect for the fellow with a single idea who gets there than for the fellow with a thousand ideas who does nothing - Thomas Alva Edison

Omega_0

#287
February 21, 2010, 03:55:11 PM
One more.
This will double the reluctance for same amount of current.
.
I have more respect for the fellow with a single idea who gets there than for the fellow with a thousand ideas who does nothing - Thomas Alva Edison

gyulasun

#288
February 21, 2010, 04:11:32 PM
Quote from: Omega_0 on February 21, 2010, 03:35:43 PM
....
I don't see any need of air gap on the pickup side. You want all flux to flow into the pickup for max output. I wonder why you put it there.
....

Hi,

I think you have to use some air gap at the pickup side too, and it also needs experimentation how big gap is optimal.  I say this because with no gap at all at the pickup side, the flux from the permanent magnet will always prefer staying towards the pickup side and not readily change towards the toroid side, just because the reluctances strongly differ.
Just try the setup, close the magnetic path on the pickup coil side as shown by you and THEN try to close the path on the left hand side: even with no airgap at all you will find the toroid will be hardly attracted when its coil is off and even less attracted when its coil is ON to saturate the toroid.
I say these because I recall my tests on a Flynn parallel path setup where I found a similar behavior I described (I know the differences between this setup and the parallel path setup, but those differences do not matter from flux changing path points of view).

rgds,  Gyula

gyulasun

#289
February 21, 2010, 04:14:23 PM
Quote from: Omega_0 on February 21, 2010, 03:55:11 PM
One more.
This will double the reluctance for same amount of current.
.

Now this is a much better situation indeed, I like it! Thanks.

Gyula
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 ... 148
User actions