Solid State Orbo System

[Groundloop]

@gravityblock,

My circuit did use normal resonance. The toroid coils was in series connected to
a 555 oscillator and a mosfet transistor. My goal was to see if I could switch the
magnetic field on and off to see if I got any output in the center coil.

Alex.

[magneto_DC]

Hi Lumen,
hi Gravityblock,

let us  assume we have an input frequency = f (toroid) = 100 Hz. So, we have to have an output frequency = f (pickup coil) = 100 Hz. (The operation frequency be 100 Hz).

Can we agree on the above??


What do you suggest to be the resonant(!) frequency of the input circuit (I would prefer a parallel tank curcuit for input circuit)? Is it 50 Hz? Is it 100 Hz? Is it 200 Hz?

What do you suggest to be the resonant(!) frequency of the output curcuit? Is it 50 Hz? Is it 100Hz? Is it 200 Hz?


Thanks for answers
magneto_DC

[Bruce_TPU]

Hello ALL,

These next numbers are even more strange!  LOL

Top coil of the middle stack of 4:  By itself:
.775        V
70.8        R
0.01095    I
0.00849    P

NOW< Watch what happens when it is added in Parallel with the two directly below it.

2.105        V
45.5          R
0.04626     I
.09737       P

67.22% increase in wattage (power) because of this one coil!

Cheers,

Bruce

Morning ALL,

Next coil, this is the coil at the bottom of the 4 coils in the middle of the stack.   

Measured By itself: 
1.30        V
70.8        R
0.01836    I
0.02387    P

Measured in Parallel with the last three, and their parallel reading is quoted above:
2.65         V
38.4         R
0.06901     I
0.18288     P                 OLD Power (wattage) total of three coils: .09737

AGAIN a 53% GAIN in wattage! 

Will this continue?  the next coil is at the bottom under the toroid.  Will it affect the ones above?  When I get home from work, we will find out....

Wait till I switch this sucker with some electronics, add some resonance tuning, etc....  I am VERY encouraged.

P.S.  This is just ONE module.  I have 4 toroids in series, so could build many more modules...without affecting power input.

Cheers,

Bruce

[wings]

 

COP=8.1

http://jnaudin.free.fr/2SGen/indexen.htm#COP


Ferrites_and_Ferromagnetics_Free_Energy_Generation

[lumen]

Hi Lumen,
hi Gravityblock,

let us  assume we have an input frequency = f (toroid) = 100 Hz. So, we have to have an output frequency = f (pickup coil) = 100 Hz. (The operation frequency be 100 Hz).

Can we agree on the above??


What do you suggest to be the resonant(!) frequency of the input circuit (I would prefer a parallel tank circuit for input circuit)? Is it 50 Hz? Is it 100 Hz? Is it 200 Hz?

What do you suggest to be the resonant(!) frequency of the output circuit? Is it 50 Hz? Is it 100Hz? Is it 200 Hz?


Thanks for answers
magneto_DC

magneto,

Because you know what a parallel tank circuit is, I will assume you have built them before in some radio circuit or filter before and understand that normally the best output frequency would be the same as the input frequency.

This is because the coupling of the windings would operate in phase in a normal transformer condition so the output frequency would also be in phase with the input.

The concept involved here is operating with NO coupling between the coils (providing the toroid coils were wound correctly) and is based on core saturation or near saturation.

Core saturation in the toroidal coil will occur because of the input current and is not based on the direction of the input current. This causes the state change twice per cycle on the input.

The flux that it outputs however, is always the same direction. To be in phase with this flux, the output must complete it's cycle at these peaks, and that is twice the input frequency.

So for 100Hz input, the output would be 200Hz to be in phase.