Solid State Orbo System

[teslaalset]

"When they send out some of these boards to SKDB members, we will find independent verification all over the world. Anyone with an oscilloscope and some voltage and current probes can measure this."

http://hdeasy.blogspot.com/

Don't forget you need a â,¬419/year license...
(only for personal use, commercialization not allowed)

It's time Steorn shows us prototypes instead of interviews.
(although they don't owe us anything, of course)

[NTesla]

Don't forget you need a â,¬419/year license...
(only for personal use, commercialization not allowed)

It's time Steorn shows us prototypes instead of interviews.
(although they don't owe us anything, of course)

I agree. I might consider the â,¬419/year license fee however I would require a gaurantee that the information given can enable - under resonable conditions - replication of an overunity device. Otherwise what's the point? I for one have tired of claims on devices which when multiple independent people have built to spec amount to nothing (ahem M.E.G). And no...saying "Naudin replicated it and 'a few others'" doesn't cut it. Where is the proof?

A question to anyone who IS a member of the Steorn SKDB - is the information provided enough to replicate an overunity device?

[rave154]

TOTALLY agree with you NTesla

as for the "MEG" .......1 word will siffice....and that word is..... pfffffft

[exnihiloest]

...
It's time Steorn shows us prototypes instead of interviews. (although they don't owe us anything, of course)

...I for one have tired of claims on devices which when multiple independent people have built to spec amount to nothing (ahem M.E.G). And no...saying "Naudin replicated it and 'a few others'" doesn't cut it. Where is the proof?
...

Hi. I agree with you both. Imho Steorn would not have to let us pay a â,¬419/year license if they have really something: they could just give all the information to build their device and successful replications worldwide would give them back fame and credibility, and therefore money from investors wanting to exploit their patents.

[teslaalset]

Hi. I agree with you both. Imho Steorn would not have to let us pay a â,¬419/year license if they have really something: they could just give all the information to build their device and successful replications worldwide would give them back fame and credibility, and therefore money from investors wanting to exploit their patents.

Yup. Like others, I don't really understand their strategy to have developers pay money to get the technology details to develop commercial products.

In the end they can ask license fees for commercial products.
If they really have something, this is where their major income will be generated.
Not from the small pocket money they ask for development licenses.
Now they have set up a hurdle for the individual developers, which will hamper product introductions.

Maybe they are afraid that the real trick is too simple and that there will be a lot of implementers that will build a device for private use and therefore not buy commercial implementations. In such case Steorn won't get license fees of many devices.

Also, I haven't seen the real patent(s) that will be licensed.
What else would they want to license, if there are no patents? The only thing I can think of is logo or brand name, which is out of the question here.
Unique designs could be protected and licensed, but if I can improve such design, that will not be protected by the original protected design.
An other possibility is that they have patents pending. Question is whether they will be granted.

This license program is all quite misty, which affects their credibility.