Global Warming Truth

[Azorus]

It would also take away from the article if it said that only 28.15% of scientist answered yes to both questions.  The article is meant to get headlines, nothing more.  When a survey picks a certian field it is bias.  You would say it is bias of fox, or cnn if they only picked democrats for surveys or librals.  When you exculed all other data, but that with which looks good, you are publishing falsities.

[4Tesla]

You would say it is bias of fox, or cnn if they only picked democrats for surveys or librals. 

Fox would never pick democrats..  LOL
Fox = conservative news

[PaulLowrance]

qouted

Results show that overall, 90% of participants
answered “risen” to question 1
and 82% answered yes to question 2. In
general, as the level of active research
and specialization in climate science
increases, so does agreement with the two
primary questions (Figure 1). In our survey,
the most specialized and knowledgeable
respondents (with regard to climate
change) are those who listed climate science
as their area of expertise and who
also have published more than 50% of
their recent peer-reviewed
papers on the
subject of climate change (79 individuals
in total). Of these specialists, 96.2%
(76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1
and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question
2.

What this part of your article is saying that there is bias in it because it only picks a select field of research and then tosses out the rest of the data.  In other words the article is flawed, it would be more reasonable to say that yes only 90% of researchers agree global temps are rising, but instead they wanted to make headlines by saying 96.2%.

LOL, I think this is funny that you are telling University scientists how to conduct science. I'm tired of explaining basic science to you.

BTW, the "over 97%" is the % of scientists who believe humanity is the significant cause of global warming. Not about how many believe global warming is occurring. Obviously if ~ 97% believe humanity is the significant cause, then a higher percentage will believe something is causing global warming.

[PaulLowrance]

Fox would never pick democrats..  LOL
Fox = conservative news

I agree. Even a blind person could tell. That's why I have it blocked because they're so biased.  What are thoughts on MSN news channel? It seems a bit liberal, and hence biased. Personally I like CNN, as it seems to be relatively unbiased.

[tbird]

if you can get thru this 149 page account of the climategate emails, you will see why it is so hard to believe the IPCC reports.  a few bad apples has soiled the barrel.

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/climategate_analysis.pdf

tom