Global Warming Truth

[PaulLowrance]

But Paul... you just did the same thing to me. You did not answer my question, only part of it. You chopped up my question, and only answered what I asked, completely missing the point of my question.

Liar. Here's the link to my post, so show everyone here where I did the "same thing". Show me where I chopped your sentence in half and tried to put words in your mouth -->

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8608.msg221179#msg221179

I don't want to talk you people.



The facts still remain:

http://globalfreeenergy.info/2010/01/07/global-warming-truth/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_consensus
"Over 97% of actively publishing climate scientists agree that human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation is a significant contributing factor to global climate change[1]"

Credible research scientists such as Gavin Schmidt with NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies are saying the recent global warming email incident has nothing to do with disproving global warming. Quote from Gavin Schmidt at NASA, "There’s nothing in the e-mails that shows that global warming is a hoax"

Unscientific anti global warmest say the over the past year the planet is now cooling. That falls under the bad science category because it is impossible to obtain a global warming trend from averaging global temperatures from a few years, and the reason is due to global temperature fluctuations. Global temperatures have always fluctuated by significant amounts. Real scientists find the trend from decades of global temperatures, which clearly shows the global warming trend.

[ResinRat2]

Paul, you did it again, it is as plain as daylight.

Why don't you answer my question? I want everyone to see what kind of global-socialist nut-job you really are.

   " So let me get this straight, just so I understand clearly. You would work for free at your job (I assume you have a job, I don't know for sure.) and willingly give it all away to the Government to save the planet? Now, just in case you don't realize it, you need to pay for food and clothing and energy, etc. Since you have no money you would starve and die naked and homeless, unless you believe that someone will support you for all your needs?

    AAhhhh, this must be where your savior Obama (whom you adore) comes in. Big Government will take every penny that everyone makes, use it to save the planet, and equally distribute it to everyone. The ultimate utopian Socialist dream. Incredible. Now I see. It's the only explanation, unless you can explain your ridiculous statement on this subject.

    You see why I don't have any respect for your opinion on this matter? You are blinded to the extreme. Unless you plan to clarify what you really mean? I have to assume you believe in worldwide Global Government that would redistribute wealth throughout the world and use all the confiscated wealth to save the planet and take care of all our needs.

    Is this what you believe? If not, please correct this statement."

[PaulLowrance]

Paul, you did it again, it is as plain as daylight.

You can't even think straight. Your previous sentence said I did the same thing. I did not chop your sentence. I did not take your sentence out of context. I answered your question.

To answer you question, again, in different words, I believe in everything I have written.

Maybe what you're trying to do now is bury Bill's sick false accusation. I will not allow that. I will never let Bill's sick act go away. I'll show everyone his sickness.

[ResinRat2]

Let me restate it for all to see:

So you do believe in a worldwide Global Government that would redistribute wealth throughout the world and use all the confiscated wealth to save the planet and take care of all our needs.

Is this what you believe? If not, please correct this statement.

I just want everyone to see what kind of a nut-case you are.

[PaulLowrance]

Let me repeat it so everyone can see how guilty you are:

"I have to assume you believe in worldwide Global Government that would redistribute wealth throughout the world and use all the confiscated wealth to save the planet and take care of all our needs.

Is this what you believe? If not, please correct this statement."

I want everyone to know what kind of person you are and what we are dealing with.

First of all, that is not my quote, just to be clear to everyone. Second of all, I never said such a thing. You try to make it sound like the government is going to take all of your money to save the planet. That's how you people operate. You twist words in sick way.

For anyone who wants to know, scientists are very concerned about climate change, to say the least. Nobody is trying to take everyone's money to save anything. IMO it's great that our government officials are considering spending ~ 2% on climate issues. Look at how much $ we spend on military, and various other things. So yes, I think 2% is very reasonable for climate issues.

As for myself, as clearly stated, *I* would give my all to help save the natural environment of this planet. You people need to stop lying, and stop twisting my words.