Joule Thief replications - not overunity

[jadaro2600]

Just because Paul can't build a JT that works well, he has to bad mouth the circuit and those of us that work with them. 

Where are your devices Paul? 

Also it is interesting to note on Paul's website he has a statement where he says once he finds an energy device that works, he will market and sell them. What happened to OPEN SOURCE?

Here is my latest video of a cool light I made tonight using the "useless" JT circuit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qE0EtXB_RqE

I apologize for this "massive distraction".

Bill

Tone aside, you've made some good points.  The idea, though; I think that there will be a noticeable difference between a basic Joule Thief and one which is over unity.

It should also be noted that most circuit diagrams don't adequately convey special winding techniques employed by their builders.

In keeping with the spirit of creating positive work flow, I think this thread could use a better definition: why did this get started in the first place?

[innovation_station]

I DO KNOW WHY .... LOL

for THAT i thank paul deeply! 
i do know how it works ...  : )

cuz ITS UNCLE BUILD!

UNCLE SAM!

im on it ... 

me and my box of junk

: )

H

[PaulLowrance]

Maybe not overunity... but illegitimate distraction? Are you out of your mind?

See my latest video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsRer0lwVNQ

I would rather be wasting my time on devices that actually work and can be made into something useful than chasing my tail with unproven overunity claims... LOL whos the sucker?. If we spent half our time on ideas like improving the JT we could be solving some real problems in the end...

UZ

I can't speak about other claims, but the Steorn claim is very important. The first test I did showed  on video the magnets rapidly dropping by nearly 3°F *below ambient room temperature* in a matter of seconds.

[PaulLowrance]

Tone aside, you've made some good points.  The idea, though; I think that there will be a noticeable difference between a basic Joule Thief and one which is over unity.

It should also be noted that most circuit diagrams don't adequately convey special winding techniques employed by their builders.

In keeping with the spirit of creating positive work flow, I think this thread could use a better definition: why did this get started in the first place?

jadaro2600,

I'm surprised that you would say that without even pointing out how Pirate88179 has out right slandered me. He actually cut most of the text out of my sentence so that he can out right lie. Read my public statement  -->

http://globalfreeenergy.info/public-statement/

"I have never asked or accepted money for my research. I will not accept money or be bought out. I will continue the research until the exact detailed designs to replicate a “Free Energy machine” is in public hands and wide spread. Then, and only then will I start a company to market and sell such machines to people and companies who are uninterested in building their own. My full 100% intent is to help this world as much as possible"

[PaulLowrance]

I DO KNOW WHY .... LOL

for THAT i thank paul deeply! 
i do know how it works ...  : )

cuz ITS UNCLE BUILD!

UNCLE SAM!

im on it ... 

me and my box of junk

: )

H

i will not get into it with you paul ...

regards


YOU SIR ARE VERRY WRONG! 

H

LOL, yeah right. That's why you can't demonstrate it. That's why you & the gang avoid COP measurements like the plague.