Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

I encourage experimenting, absolutely. I also encourage deep analysis and thorough research. With the exception of those two scope shots (which mean very little without supporting data) I have not seen evidence here of any of the above 3.

Claims are numerous and cheap to make. Sadly, most don't even attempt to support their claims with credible evidence (nor know how to go about it), and thus far it holds true in this case as well.

I think the basis for and normality of your observations has been adequately explained to you here, and it is up to you now to refute them by clearly demonstrating the existence of those so-called USE's and the resulting OU or FE.

Good luck!

.99

Dear poynt99,

I found the experimental description we did sometime ago on fluid velocity.  At that time, I did not link that to resonance.  Now it is obvious.  The title was "kinetic theory of gases in motion".

http://goldfield123.freehomepage.com/Lawrence3.htm

Experiments done in the past and buried at the back of our brains may help.  Repeating them is not a problem.  I am sure that Observer have done enough experiments with the Guitars and the tuning forks to have the conviction that two tuning forks sound louder and longer than one.

I am ready to defend this new God granted truth of sound resonance.  The pulse ordering motion of the gas molecules brings-in the kinetic energy of the gas molecules into the sound (e.g. tuning fork) systems.

[FatBird]

Thank you for sharing your thoughts & photos Lawrence.

[XS-NRG]

OMG when you think you saw it all it gets even more crazy.
Observer i encourage you to go and take some sort of SCOPE READING CLASS!!!!!

[ltseung888]

The more official, scientific wording on Transmission of Sound through Air

The previous understanding of transmission of sound through air is that the sound waves are caused by the vibrating source.  The sound energy comes from the vibrating source alone.

The new Tseung understanding of transmission of sound through air is that the sound waves are caused by the vibrating source.  At the same time, some of the kinetic energy of the air molecules is lead-out or brought-in because the totally random motion of the molecules is replaced by the pulsing order of the sound waves. 

The confirmation of energy coming from the air molecules is via sympathetic vibrations of two or more identical tuning forks in resonance.  The resulting sound is louder and lasts longer than when only one tuning fork is struck. 

The explanation is that any vibrating source will radiate the sound energy in all six directions.  The actual energy that can be imparted to a second or third tuning fork is very small.  The resulting louder and long sound must gain additional energy from the surrounding environment. 

From the well established and understood Kinetic Theory of Gases, the air molecules collide with each other and bombard the walls.  Each molecule will have kinetic energy equal to 1/2 mV*V where m is mass of the molecule and V is the molecular velocity.  The ordered pulsing of the sound wave orientates the random motion of the molecules into some ordered motions.  These ordered motions leads-out or brings-in the existing kinetic energy of the molecules into the sound transmission environment.  The lead-out or brought-in energy is responsible for the much louder and longer sound at resonance or at sympathetic vibrations.

With God’s Blessing, the new Tseung understand will be accepted by the scientific community in the near future.  This will have a great impact on the understanding of sound and resonance.  Leading-out or Bringing-in of energy at or near resonance of all forms will be accepted and vigorously researched.

[The Observer]

Poynt,

Thanks for the comment.
I'm sure if you resonate a transformer in your spare time, you will find a non-linear effect on the output.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT,

I appreciate your theory on the air being the reason that the tuning forks ring louder and longer.
            However, I think half of your theory is right, and the other half wrong.

1. The half that I think is right...

    - When the natural motion of molecules is synced by resonance...
                                                it is possible the energy that moves the molecules
                                                                            is realized in the energy of the vibration in the resonating object.

          - note.. the same material can have lots of different natural frequencies depending on dimensions.
                   ... therefore, the time that a wave moves from one end of an object to the other, comes into play.

2. The half I think is wrong...

    - It's not the air doing the work in the tuning fork example.
    - The only way Air can give off extra energy is if IT (the air) is resonated. (an Acoustic Cavity or Helmholtz Resonator)
    - In the tuning fork example, Air is the carrier of energy (it never resonates), what resonates is the Fork.

Never-the-less, I believe this (my idea combined with yours) is a definitive step in explaining what is happening.

Thank you.  ;o)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XS,

I appreciate your interest in my Resonating Transformer Summary of the Summary.
It was an abbreviated version of my Resonating Homemade Flyback Transformer Experiment.

Below is a more complete version for you viewing pleasure.  ;o)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best Regards,
                    The Observer