Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

WTF ? This is an OU topic or a comic topic ? What about the main subject: " Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets" ?
Kunel Patent is a pulsed DC transformer, but I have a question here what about Lenz Law in this case. Several months ago I have theorised a pulsed DC transfomer that draw energy from magnetics fields of a magnet (after research I have saw this devices has already invented (Kunel Patent). So the theory is simple: the magnet provide a flux in the iron bar, the control coil pulse and repel the magnet (but the magnet can move away he is glued) when the control coil is switch off, the magnet restore the flux in the iron bar inducing an EMF in the receiver coils, Lenz Law of the receiver coils apply to the magnet not control coil. What do you think about this theory ? In another design I think you can replace the magnet by a DC Bias coil, and close the loop in form of a toroid, like a TPU !!!

Edit: Sorry for the large image that deform the forum...

Dear SchubertReijiMaigo,

Thank you for your post.  I am concentrating on the most important physics question â€" if the Output Energy of any claimed OU device is greater than the Input Energy, where does that energy come from?

That question is much more important than Lenz Law.

I firmly believe that the extra energy is lead-out or bring-in from the surrounding environment.  The extra energy can be the kinetic energy of the moving gas molecules, the vibrating energy of solid molecules, the gravitational energy or the electron motion energy of the trillions of electrons surrounding us. 

At resonance of any form, the amplitude of vibration or oscillation increases exponentially.  Such an exponential behavior can easily be explained if we assume that extra energy is brought-in into the system and a feedback mechanism is present. 

Thus your device or the Kunel Patent is likely to be some form of electromagnetic resonance leading-out or bringing-in electron motion energy.  Your research direction is correct and theoretically sound.  It is a matter of nailing down the practical configuration to produce working devices.  Thus the Steven Mark TPU may not be a hoax.

Many have succeeded but ridiculed.  Examples are Newman, Bedini, Liang, Wang and yours truly.  (Just read the insults on this thread.  When the paid cowards cannot attack the technology, they hurl insults behind a username.  Forgive them as they have to make a living and feed their families too.)

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited (Hong Kong)

[FatBird]

@ Itseung888  Many have succeeded but ridiculed.  Examples are Newman, Bedini, Liang, Wang and yours truly.  (Just read the insults on this thread.  When the paid cowards cannot attack the technology, they hurl insults behind a username.  Forgive them as they have to make a living and feed their families too.)

========================================

Good points Lawrence.

[The Observer]

LT,

Thanks for you comment about my resonating transformer experiments.
-------
However, I am concerned about your idea that extra energy
                      comes from a regular old sound wave
                                traveling through the air.
 
       You need to consider the molecules of the object resonating --> the 2nd tuning fork (air is the object in an acoustic guitar).
                                       It does appear you are starting to  think about this.

        The Object that is resonating is STORING ENERGY.. that's where the conundrum lies.

       The 2nd Tuning fork...          absorbs a small amount of sound energy...
                                                       accumulates the energy vibrationally
                                                                      then vibrates
                                                              at an amplitude congruent
                                                                 to the energy stored.

Thank you for your enthusiasm on this subject.

Best Regards,
                     The Observer
       

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

Thank you for your post.  I am concentrating on the most important physics question â€" if the Output Energy of any claimed OU device is greater than the Input Energy, where does that energy come from?

That question is much more important than Lenz Law.

I firmly believe that the extra energy is lead-out or bring-in from the surrounding environment.  The extra energy can be the kinetic energy of the moving gas molecules, the vibrating energy of solid molecules, the gravitational energy or the electron motion energy of the trillions of electrons surrounding us.

Thank you for responding: I believe also some energy is pumped somewhere. In the many story FE devices have common parts like: they cooling down (VTA), sometimes gravitational/giroscopical anomaly (TPU), using coils and caps, pulsed, biased DC, feeded with AC, plays with reluctance (BITT), LC resonnance (Rotoverter and Transverter), etc... I don't know if those theories/effects are true ot not, but the main problem is the lack of information, misinterpretation of effect (counfond with conventional effect), etc... I have browsed the whole internet and this forum, I have saw many pages, but no one is able to replicate devices. What I have never saw a selflooping devices, if FE exist selflooping is just a formality even with a COP 1.1 !!!
I beleive in FE devices but I'am very sceptic, can you "selfloop" your FLEET ? I have read you have achieved COP 10, no ?

[ltseung888]

At the Church Service and Party

http://cbccoc.org/

I was invited by some old friends as a surprise.  They said, “You must come.  The babies you held in your arms are performing.”

How could I refuse such an invitation?

The Church turned out to be attended mainly by Chinese from Hong Kong.  We could converse in Cantonese.  I felt homely.

I may even be able to talk about lead-out energy in my native dialect!