Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

The kinetic theory of gases in motion model

The following diagrams are extracted from the paper and experiments done some years ago and are still available on the Internet at:

http://goldfield123.freehomepage.com/Lawrence3.htm

The top picture shows a simplified stationary gas model.  In this model, the gas molecules are NOT stationary but move in all directions.  Statistically, there are equal numbers moving in the six directions.  Thus there is no motion.  In the simplified model, all gas molecules have the same velocity.  The imaginary cube contains 60 molecules.

The bottom picture shows a simplified moving gas model.  In this model, all gas molecules maintain the same velocity.  Thus the total kinetic energy will be the same.  However, more gas molecules move in the +X direction.  The imaginary cube still contains 60 molecules.

Both pictures show the same total kinetic energy of the gas molecules.  However, the lower picture can do work as the net momentum in the +X direction is higher than that in the â€"X direction.

We can also say that the molecules in the bottom picture are more “ordered” than those in the top picture.  In the proposed Tseung Hypothesis on Sound Resonance in air, the first tuning fork “orders” the random motion of the air molecules so that a pulsing force can be exerted on the second, third, etc. tuning forks.  The ordering will requires some energy but this energy can be much less than what the bottom picture can provide as work.  (In Physics, work is equal to force x displacement and can be thought of as energy spent.)

The energy in pulsing the second, third, etc tuning forks comes from the “order” motion of the air molecules.  This is the essence of the Lee-Tseung Lead-out Energy theory.  No Laws of Physics has been violated.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited (Hong Kong)

[ltseung888]

Have you read my post about resonance ? The main problem with resonance extraction is when you place a load R, the Q factor decrease, so the resonance is damped because R increases…….


Your tuning forks idea is not wrong but not true also, I have read on Wikipedia tuning forks have a Q of 1000 !!! this is exceptional.
But try to put a load (R) at one tuning fork by touching it with your hand.
The Q is literally destroyed and your tuning fork doesn't vibrate anymore...

End of story, no energy "created"

Dear SchubertReijiMaigo,

This is actually the beginning of the story!  The Lee-Tseung lead-out energy theory deals with how to extract the lead-out energy close to or at resonance without destroying the resonance condition!

Many inventors failed in this particular attempt.  Some succeeded.  My coming conclusive experiments will verified that.

Keep thinking and posting your constructive comments.  You do not have to agree now.  But the coming experimental result that two or more tuning forks will sound louder and longer than when one is struck will be confirmed.  It is just a matter of sorting out the logistics now.

You may be able to purchase 4 tuning forks with resonance boxes in your Country easily.  If so, do the experiment.  Experiments do not lie.

[The Observer]

Schubart,

Thanks for your input.

There is a non-linear effect on power output of a transformer when it is resonating (even with a load)
An LED  has proved this. (it will not light.. except when the transformer is resonating)
                                                     (or burns out the LEDs at this frequency)

                      The easiest way to light a CFL with a Joule Thief  that won't light a CFL...

                                                                         is to use the output of the Joule Thief
                                                                                to resonate an Ignition Coil.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT,

                                       Singing Transformers... now we're talking.
                  Perhaps we can get a few together to sing a Christmas Carol or two. ;O)
                                     --->    "Joy to the World" comes to mind.  <---

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

Thank you very much, but I'am not saying this is impossible to extract but I'am just try to explain why this difficult to extract, once again this is why many inventor/replicator can not replicate OU. OU is based on resonance but resonance is very critical...

I'am here only for a couple of month, at the start I haved little Scientific knowledge, and even at this time I have a lot to learn...
Before experimentating in situ I need to have solid theory and reproductible fact to avoid wasting money...
Unfortunately I can not spending $$$ in metglass core and have a failed experiment because lack of information and weird theory.

OU research is serious, she is based on conventional theory (without these law of thermodynamic, there are true in some case, see nano infrared solar panel this is a direct 2nd law violation...).

Good luck !!!

[chrisC]

Additional Comments on Experiment 1 ....

E3.  The Lee-Tseung Lead-out energy theory may be correct.  ....

Correction: The Lee-Tseung Lead-out energy theory is delusion-ally correct and it's your clowning achievement!

cheers
chrisC