Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[minde4000]

Well said rave154.

Minde

[chrisC]

... Now we have the US Government (via Maj. Todd Hathaway) starting to get involved.  I fully expect that the many top Universities will join in.  The feeling from my team is that if Stanford, MIT or UCLA in USA come out and verify the results, the World will accept the technology.  The Hong Kong University Professors agreed to that. 

How can you be so simple minded? Surely, even a person with not much scientific background knows that Maj. Hathaway does not represent serious U.S Energy policies. There are many branches of scientific research programs funded by pork barrel politics and this may be one of them.

Also, have you also considered the similarity with Chinese custom when an establishment pays a third party some money so they stop 'bothering' them anymore. Have you considered this situation?

So, far you're like a dog begging for someone to throw you some good food but you have not shown conclusively you deserved it (because what you've 'invented' has more to do with lack of scientific understanding rather than truths) and all you got so far is a Hathaway bone to shut you up? Sorry to burst your bubble.

cheers
chrisC

[mscoffman]

@All,

Yes, overunity energy needs to be DC current dissipated in a resistive dummy load. Someone needs to
tell Steorn this. Even if we accept his circuit does indeed create overunity energy based on measurements
in the first place, how are we supposed to accept the fact that the circuity doesn't absorb that energy
back again later on in it's cycle? Show us the Beef. It's easy enough, if you have it.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[ltseung888]

The Tseung resonance theory of sound

Prof. T :”I believe your hypothesis of sound is that the vibrating object modifies the random motion of the molecules into a pulsing order.  The pulsing order leads-out or brings-in the molecular kinetic energy of the molecules into the system.  This is the reason why two or more tuning forks sound louder and last longer than one.  Is that correct?”

Tseung: “Yes.”

Prof. T: “Do you mind I quote the above as your hypothesis?”

Tseung: “Please do.  Please also quote that the exponential behavior near or at resonance is due to the feedback according to the equation (1+0.X)*(1+0.X)*(1+0.X)….”

Prof. T: “You also believe a similar mechanism occurs with electrical or LCR circuit resonance?”

Tseung: “Correct.  That is why I include sound resonance as my Conclusive Experiment 1.”

Prof. T: “I doubt any one will accuse you of stealing his or her idea.  It has never appeared like this in any scientific literature as far as I know.”

Tseung: “We can let the forum members challenge it first.  Many have posted that such an idea is wrong.  Will they change their mind and say that I stole the idea from them?”

Prof. T: “The known steps in the birth of a new theory are: (1) It is wrong.  (2) It might be right. (3) I (or some one) have the same idea and you stole it! (4) Hypothesis becomes a theory and is generally accepted.”

Blessed is the Almighty.  Some forum members are accusing me of stealing.  Success is in sight.

[tagor]

So ts need 64 Watts to receive 15 Watts?

If the "Amplifier" need 60 watt heat energy
to transfer this additionalle to the Input, i see
not an sense...

The 60 bWats thermal energy will be lost
to become the output of 15 watts
Pese

it is waste heat to  electricity !!

Nota Bene :

it is not OU

you have to compare it to solar cell 15%
with this you get a better COP => 25%

but you get also 400% with the sound !!