Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[chrisC]

You seem to be the only one realizing the expenses needed to do the experiments correctly.  Now we have at least two top universities willing to take on the task of verification.  They have the necessary equipment and expertise.

For my part, I use this forum as a diary and care very little on what the naysayers and insulters post.  If you do not like what I post, ignore them or mock at them.

When I (or any one else) do not have the expensive equipment, we can still show the results to the best capability of our equipment.  Some laughed at my bedroom laboratory in Hong Kong.  But in the end, who cares?

God helps those who help themselves.  The poor can still do experiments and display their results.  Amen.

You still don't get it do you Lawrence? Nobody has a problem with you posting your results and many, myself included really wished you actually had discovered true O.U! The angels in heaven will also rejoice if it was so.

That said, the problem people have in this thread with your experimentation is that you claimed your results proved O.U with absolute certainty!

To that we say BALONEY. Just because you said so does not mean it is true. Time and time again you have proven nothing - just shows your own ignorance of electronics and physics. You are learning more each time someone tries to correct you. Professors mean nothing if they themselves don't know enough. Two of the most admired engineers I personally have worked with are absolutely brilliant and they only have BSc degrees from my neighborhood San Jose state university. No PHD titles, no research programs - just very very good electronics engineers.


Your experimental results are NOT Gospel until they are proven. As of today, you are still deluded. But we do wish you well.

cheers
chrisC

[TinselKoala]

The problem here, Lawrence, isn't with your experimental results. Using your apparatus and techniques your results are easy to obtain.  Using better apparatus you will even be able to get better results. The problem is how you are doing your analysis of those results.

As I have tried to illustrate over and over again, if you apply your method of calculation to an optimized resonant system using EXACTLY the same principles of power magnification as your little Joule Thief that you are playing with here, you will obtain COP figures that put your measly COP=200 or 280 or whatever, to shame. This alone should cause you to question your procedures.

[The Observer]

Greetings,

There is no such thing as an OU device.

I guess anything can 'look' like OU... if you don't understand where the energy is coming from.
The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 calls what we are looking for Novel Sources of Energy.

I prefer the term USE (Unrecognized Source of Energy)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I claim to have noticed two possible USE phenomenon.

1. Magnetic Permeability... the phenom that a ferro material is made up of many magnetic dipoles (powered by free electron spin.)

                                         We utilize this energy every day.. yet do not recognize it as such.
                                          ie. A speaker with exchangeable magnets is going to produce a louder sound with a more powerful magnet.
             
2. Resonance.. the phenom that an object will store energy vibrationally and interact with the surrounding environment
                                     at an amplitude of vibration consistent with the energy the object is storing.       

                      ie. Two tuning forks ring louder and longer than one by means of feedback and the following.
                      The extra energy comes from the Molecular Motion in the forks, that was random (before Resonance) which becomes ordered.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GodSpeed,
                The Observer

[ltseung888]

Price of the right equipment

The problem here, Lawrence, isn't with your experimental results. Using your apparatus and techniques your results are easy to obtain.  Using better apparatus you will even be able to get better results. The problem is how you are doing your analysis of those results.

As I have tried to illustrate over and over again, if you apply your method of calculation to an optimized resonant system using EXACTLY the same principles of power magnification as your little Joule Thief that you are playing with here, you will obtain COP figures that put your measly COP=200 or 280 or whatever, to shame. This alone should cause you to question your procedures.

Dear  TinselKoala,

Example price of a “right equipment” US$12,500!  (Two China made 2 channel oscilloscopes = $700 (2 x350))

Tektronix DPO4054 Digital Phosphor Oscilloscope, 4 Channel, 500 MHz, 2

$12,500 online

Tektronix DPO4054 Digital Phosphor Oscilloscope 4 channels, 500 MHz, 2.5 GS/s Go to the Tektronix DPO4000/MSO4000 Series product page for more details, options, and accessories. To capture long windows of signal activity while maintaining fine timing resolution, the DPO4054 offers a deep record length of 10M points standard on all channels. With Wave Inspector controls for rapid waveform navigation, automated serial and parallel bus analysis, and automated power analysis - the Tektronix DPO4054 Digital Phosphor Oscilloscope provides the feature-rich tools you need to simplify and speed debug of your complex design. Go to the Tektronix… more »


http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&expIds=17259,18167,27084,27846&sugexp=ldymls&xhr=t&q=tektronix+4+channel+oscilloscope&cp=22&qe=dGVrdHJvbml4IDQgY2hhbm5lbCBvc2NpbGxvc2NvcGU&qesig=8xka6uy5WW2q0_6dhIUcMg&pkc=AFgZ2tn6DdS1QiqPgmXE7bZ-WdVtXali1HyTlMK-ojZmpwNh_buWsNXU3vufvNspCFdty4jChrLFEHzeuadwIj6Pa6_nAX8X7A&wrapid=tljp129432395640640&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=5829712225184234621&ei=9NAlTef8M4eosAOPlLnrAQ&sa=X&oi=product_catalog_result&ct=result&resnum=5&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQ8wIwBA#

[ltseung888]

Additional requirement for those who want to be a verifier of FLEET

Please quote the model of the oscilloscope(s) you intend to use in the verification.

Thanks to TinselKoala, Omnibus and others, I can greatly reduce the Prototypes to be shipped out.

God works in mysterious ways.  Insults can be constructive too.