Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[TinselKoala]

I think you have some mental health issues and your obsession with my character assassination is getting creepy. You are starting to remind me of this guy:

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/01/09/20110109gabrielle-giffords-arizona-shooting-victims.html

He also had an obsessive personality disorder. Maybe you could go suck the life and fun out of Bill's thread? We were having fun here until you showed up.

You are doing a fine job of character assassination yourself. Character suicide more like it, because the character you are assassinating is yourself.

Given the fact that you claimed to be from Australia, New Zealand and now Canada makes me wonder who are and what exactly is your agenda? You claim to live "several 10's of miles" from the inventor of the magnecoaster in Ontario Canada... Just one problem with that statement - Canadians measure distance in kilometers.

Please indicate just where I have ever claimed to be from Australia, New Zealand, or Canada. MagnaCoaster's claimed plant is in Kitchener Ontario, and at the moment I am posting from Mississauga, Ontario. You will find, if you come here, that many cars still have "miles" on their speedometer/odometer. And many maps do too. Since you are mathematically challenged, I did the math for you.
For your information I am an American citizen, born in Arkansas, and my legal residence is in South Texas. Oh, by the way, this is known by most of the old-time posters here.

Koala bears are from Australia and you claim that is the reason for your user name.

Please indicate where I have ever claimed that my user name has anything to do with Australia or koala bears. My user name is an anagram of Nikola Tesla, nothing more and nothing less. Ok, I admit: it's a poke at Archer Quinn.

Continue to make these insane posts to me and I am going to contact law enforcement.

Threaten away. You will find that "Law Enforcement" deals in fact, not innuendo and false claims. But everything you have claimed in your above post is simply wrong, and most of the rest of us know it.

[TinselKoala]

Come on fellows, why not focus on the topic at hand?

The main point, as far as I see it, is that Lawrence is not even using a good JT circuit here.  The circuit he is using is an early variation of the MK-1 circuit.  Mark posted that about 2 years ago.  since then, we have had the Hazen's circuit, the Jeanna circuit and Gadget's circuit, all of which are far more efficient (I did NOT say OU) than the one he is using for his tests.  Mark has since created many more designs that are also far ahead of Larry's.

He should have read the rest of the JT topic especially when we started using supercaps instead of batteries. (Over 1 year ago)  This changes the dynamics of the circuit and allows some really cool things to happen.

I too used to abuse Larry a few years ago because I thought then, as I do now, that his physics explanations were not correct.  But, then I grew up and decided that so what if he is going down a dead end road?  As long as he is not selling "Free Energy" plans or stock, then who cares?  And, by God, IF he happens to be correct, which I truly doubt, I will be one of the first to congratulate him.

Not that an outsider would ever notice but there is a lot of collective intelligence here, even including some of the trolls so, my advice is to build something.

TK, this is not directed at you in any way as I have followed your many builds and testing and experiments for some time and have learned a lot from you.

So, come on fellows, let's try to do something constructive ok?

Thanks,

Bill

Bill, as you will note, the thread had disintegrated into several pages of nothing, until I posted my oscilloscope comment directed at helping Professor use the equipment he had available at that time to test Lawrence's device. (I have been ignoring the outrageous claims that q2 makes before that point.) But then quark2 jumped in as you can see with the outrageously ignorant claims about current monitoring by hooking an ammeter ACROSS a resistor, scopes measuring 'current drop', the multiple resistor value error, and the phase relationship error (which he still has not addressed.) When I initially asked him to support his assertions he became abusive and belligerent, insulting to Canadians, and so on, while defending his mistake in the most obnoxious manner.  OK.... I try to stick to the discussion by asking him to support his contentions and claims with evidence, he comes back with potty mouth insults.  And he continues to make patently wrong and unsupportable claims. Why is this person even allowed to post, since he's belligerent, threatening, making false claims, and so on?

[TinselKoala]

Preserved here for the record:

[cite]quark2[/cite]
@ XS-NRG

Hey buddy - Thanks for the troll assist but I can fry my own Canadian bacon and your comments are only clouding the debate.

I wrote what I meant and my argument stands. Once TinselKoala's frozen brain learns to read, he will make that apology or be written off as just another idiot lacking integrity. I would prefer to not have to write him off since he is smart albeit the reading and comprehension problem.

You measure the current drop across 1 of the resistors in parallel as shown and multiply times the number of resistors as stated. That gives you a true RMS current reading.

When it comes to measuring power, current is the one that matters most. I can make a million volts of useless static and can't do much with it without a vacuum tube containing a gas to convert it into current.

Abusive and insulting, or not? While "standing by" his wrong argument.

[XS-NRG]

So, come on fellows, let's try to do something constructive ok?

Thanks,

Bill

YES BILL!!!
You must be a SAINT too !!
Your name is Bill it must be a sign! For people who want to reduce the Bill!!

I will turn to the Almighty tonight and ask him if he wants to reduce his Bill Bill. 

Bringing an actual device here is like handing out pork chop sandwiches at a Jewish picnic.

[quarktoo]

Preserved here for the record:
Abusive and insulting, or not? While "standing by" his wrong argument.

Preserved for "the record"

You are clearly in need of some psychotherapy. You take a post from before I realized my brain lock and apologized for my error and claim I am standing by my argument. You need to get a life and move on.

People are trying to nicely point out to you that you have gone over the edge - get a clue.

You asked me about measuring pulsed power. I said I have an old scope and a true RMS meter. I said I didn't have a clue beyond that and I tried to recant a conversation that is on this server between two people.

The female who as I recall worked for Tektronix or Intel stated she would not trust the measurement unless she had about 8 resistors in parallel to make sure the current and voltage were properly phased, measure the voltage drop (which I incorrectly quoted) and apply ohms law.

You take that little error and obsess on that to the point of creepy Then you feel that is justification for you to publicly defame me with many misquotes and by taking things out of context.

I deleted my MANY apologies and left one. The others I replaced with piss off. Take a hint.

Why don't you go ask your employer (Bombabier?) a simple question or two:

Give he or she this message - I want to thank your employee TinselKoala for making these posts and a youtube video from his place of employment. This creates a civil case in which his employer is liable should I decide to pursue that since he used computers, internet connection, test equipment etc. from that place of employment.

1. Is your liability insurance is paid up.

2. Do you have have retained counsel.

Ask your employer if you will still have a job the day after they get served. It would cost less than $1000 to identify you through a court order served in a German court. My wife works at one of the largest law forms in the US. Think about it.

Meanwhile, as stated, seek therapy. You have seriously gone over the edge.

LETS TRY THIS - SORRY (FOR THE THIRD TIME) I BRAIN LOCKED ON RECANTING A CURRENT READING METHOD I READ YEARS TWO AGO BETWEEN TWO PEOPLE!!!!

I AM AN OLDER PERSON AND MY MEMORY MUST NOT BE WHAT IT USED TO BE. I SUGGEST YOU GROW UP AND GET SOME HELP WITH YOUR PROBLEM. YOU ARE MAKING RESISTOR BANKS AND A VIDEO AND CRAZY POSTS OVER A LITTLE BRAIN LOCK FOR A DAY. DON'T YOU SEE HOW CRAZY YOU ARE ACTING???